Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

healthkit-code-review

Reviews HealthKit code for authorization patterns, query usage, background delivery, and data type handling. Use when reviewing code with import HealthKit, HKHealthStore, HKSampleQuery, HKObserverQuery, or HKQuantityType.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (5)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/authorization.md4.5 KB
  • references/background.md6.2 KB
  • references/data-types.md7.1 KB
  • references/queries.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

HealthKit Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
HKHealthStore, permissions, status checks, privacyreferences/authorization.md
HKQuery types, predicates, anchored queries, statisticsreferences/queries.md
Background delivery, observer queries, completion handlersreferences/background.md
HKQuantityType, HKCategoryType, workouts, unitsreferences/data-types.md

Review Checklist

  • HKHealthStore.isHealthDataAvailable() called before any HealthKit operations
  • Authorization requested only for needed data types (minimal permissions)
  • requestAuthorization completion handler not misinterpreted as permission granted
  • No attempt to determine read permission status (privacy by design)
  • Query results dispatched to main thread for UI updates
  • HKObjectQueryNoLimit used only with bounded predicates
  • HKStatisticsQuery used for aggregations instead of manual summing
  • Observer query completionHandler() always called (use defer)
  • Background delivery registered in application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:)
  • Background delivery entitlement added (iOS 15+)
  • Correct units used for quantity types (e.g., count/min for heart rate)
  • Long-running queries stored as properties and stopped in deinit

When to Load References

  • Reviewing authorization/permissions flow -> authorization.md
  • Reviewing HKSampleQuery, HKAnchoredObjectQuery, or predicates -> queries.md
  • Reviewing HKObserverQuery or enableBackgroundDelivery -> background.md
  • Reviewing HKQuantityType, HKCategoryType, or HKWorkout -> data-types.md

Review gates

Run in order. Do not state a finding in a later step until the pass condition for the current step is satisfied (each pass condition is answerable from the codebase under review).

  1. Scope — Pass: Name the file path(s) and types/symbols using HealthKit, HKHealthStore, or HK* APIs (or state clearly that the diff touches none).
  2. Availability and store — Pass: Cite the call site of isHealthDataAvailable() before HealthKit use, or document why omission is acceptable for the scoped code; cite where HKHealthStore is created or injected.
  3. Authorization semantics — Pass: For each requestAuthorization / getRequestStatusForAuthorization, cite handler branches per references/authorization.md (e.g. success does not prove read access); do not infer read permission from authorizationStatus alone.
  4. Queries and limits — Pass: For each query, cite predicate + limit (HKObjectQueryNoLimit only with a bounded predicate); for totals/aggregates, cite HKStatisticsQuery / collection vs manual summing per references/queries.md.
  5. Observers and background — Pass: If HKObserverQuery or enableBackgroundDelivery appears, cite where the observer is started/stopped and where background delivery is registered; cite entitlements/Info.plist or flag missing config per references/background.md. If absent, Pass: one line “no observer/background in scope.”
  6. Threading and lifecycle — Pass: Cite main-queue (or documented pattern) for UI updates from query callbacks; cite retention/stop()/deinit for long-running queries per checklist above.

Review Questions

  1. Is isHealthDataAvailable() checked before creating HKHealthStore?
  2. Does the code gracefully handle denied permissions (empty results)?
  3. Are observer query completion handlers called in all code paths?
  4. Is work in background handlers minimal (~15 second limit)?
  5. Are HKQueryAnchors persisted per sample type (not shared)?

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when you need to mine a conversation, session transcript, or design discussion for architectural decisions before writing ADRs. Identifies problem-solution pairs, trade-off debates, technology choices, and explicit "[ADR]" tags. Triggers on "what decisions did we make", "extract decisions from this chat", "find the choices in our discussion", or "summarize architectural decisions". Also useful after long planning sessions to capture decisions that were made implicitly. Does NOT write ADR documents — use adr-writing or write-adr for that.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

Use when writing or formatting an ADR document using the MADR template, applying Definition of Done (E.C.A.D.R.) criteria, or verifying ADR completeness. Triggers on "write the ADR", "format as MADR", "check ADR quality", "mark gaps in ADR". Also triggers when a decision has been extracted and needs to become a document. Does NOT extract decisions from conversations (use adr-decision-extraction) or orchestrate the full extract-confirm-write workflow (use write-adr).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

Reviews App Intents code for intent structure, entities, shortcuts, and parameters. Use when reviewing code with import AppIntents, @AppIntent, AppEntity, AppShortcutsProvider, or @Parameter.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

existential-birds/beagle84Updated Sep 16, 2026

See all skills by existential-birds

Report a problem with this skill