Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

analyzing-health-insurance-plans

Evaluates health insurance plan structures with actuarial value, network analysis, and cost projection. Use when analyzing health plans, comparing coverage, or projecting healthcare costs.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Analyzing Health Insurance Plans

When To Use

  • Comparing multiple health insurance plan options (employer group, individual market, or Medicare Advantage)
  • Evaluating actuarial value and metal-tier classification accuracy
  • Projecting out-of-pocket costs under different utilization scenarios
  • Assessing network adequacy for a specific population or geographic area
  • Reviewing plan design changes for renewal or repricing cycles
  • Analyzing reinsurance attachment points and stop-loss adequacy relative to plan exposure

Inputs To Gather

  • Plan documents: Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC), Schedule of Benefits, Certificate of Coverage, Evidence of Coverage
  • Rate filings: Premium rates by tier (single, employee+spouse, family), age-banding tables if applicable
  • Network data: Provider directory or network ID, in-network vs. out-of-network reimbursement schedules, any tiered or narrow network designations
  • Claims history (if available): Aggregate paid claims, large-claimant data, utilization rates by service category
  • Census data: Member demographics, enrollment counts by tier, geographic distribution
  • Formulary: Drug tier structure, prior authorization requirements, specialty drug handling
  • Reinsurance/stop-loss terms: Specific and aggregate attachment points, lasering exclusions, contract period (paid vs. incurred basis)
  • Comparison context: Benchmark plans, prior-year plan design, or competing carrier quotes

Workflow

  1. Classify the plan structure

    • Identify plan type: HMO, PPO, EPO, POS, HDHP/HSA-eligible, or hybrid
    • Confirm metal tier (Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum) or equivalent actuarial value band
    • Note any non-standard design features: reference-based pricing, direct primary care carve-outs, or centers-of-excellence requirements
  2. Calculate actuarial value

    • Map cost-sharing parameters: deductible, coinsurance, copays, out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM)
    • Apply standard continuance tables or the CMS AV Calculator methodology to estimate the plan's share of total allowed costs [VERIFY: confirm which AV calculator version or methodology is required for the filing year]
    • Flag deviations from de minimis AV ranges for the stated metal tier (±2 percentage points under ACA rules) [VERIFY: state-specific AV requirements may differ]
  3. Analyze network adequacy

    • Check provider-to-member ratios for primary care, specialty, and facility categories against applicable state or CMS standards [VERIFY: network adequacy standards vary by state and market segment]
    • Identify geographic access gaps using drive-time/distance thresholds
    • Assess out-of-network exposure: balance billing protections, surprise billing act applicability, reference pricing methodology
  4. Project member cost exposure

    • Model total cost of care under low, moderate, and high utilization scenarios
    • Calculate effective member cost share: premiums + expected out-of-pocket spend per scenario
    • Compare across plans using equivalent annual cost metrics (premium + expected OOP at each utilization level)
    • For HDHP plans, factor in HSA/HRA employer contributions and tax-advantage value
  5. Evaluate pharmacy benefits

    • Map formulary tiers and typical member cost for high-utilization drug categories
    • Identify specialty drug exposure and accumulator/maximizer program impact on OOPM
    • Note step therapy, prior authorization, and quantity limit protocols
  6. Assess risk transfer and reinsurance

    • Review specific stop-loss attachment points relative to historical large-claimant frequency
    • Evaluate aggregate stop-loss corridor and expected claims variability
    • Flag any lasered members or excluded conditions and quantify retained risk
    • For self-funded plans, assess claims-fund adequacy and IBNR reserves
  7. Compile comparative analysis

    • Build side-by-side comparison matrix covering: premiums, cost sharing, AV, network breadth, pharmacy, and risk transfer
    • Rank plans on total effective cost, network quality, and financial risk exposure
    • Highlight material trade-offs (e.g., lower premium but narrow network, high deductible offset by HSA funding)

Output

  • Plan Analysis Summary: One-page overview with plan classification, AV calculation result, and key cost metrics
  • Cost Projection Table: Low/moderate/high utilization scenario modeling with annual premium + OOP totals per plan
  • Network Adequacy Assessment: Provider ratio analysis, geographic access findings, and out-of-network risk notes
  • Pharmacy Benefit Summary: Formulary tier structure, specialty drug exposure, and accumulator program flags
  • Reinsurance/Stop-Loss Review (if applicable): Attachment point adequacy, retained risk quantification, and lasering impact
  • Comparative Matrix: Side-by-side plan ranking with trade-off commentary
  • Flagged Items: Any data gaps, assumptions made, or items requiring [VERIFY] follow-up

Quality Checks

  • Confirm all cost-sharing parameters (deductible, coinsurance, copay, OOPM) are captured for both in-network and out-of-network tiers
  • Verify AV calculations use the correct methodology and plan year assumptions
  • Ensure utilization scenarios reflect realistic claims distributions (not just arbitrary multiples)
  • Check that premium comparisons use consistent contribution assumptions (gross vs. net of employer subsidy)
  • Validate network data is current — provider directories can be 60–90 days stale
  • Confirm reinsurance terms match the contract period and claims basis (paid vs. incurred)
  • Flag any state-mandated benefit requirements that could affect plan design comparability [VERIFY: essential health benefit benchmark varies by state]
  • Mark all jurisdiction-dependent regulatory references with [VERIFY]

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

See all skills by FDU-INS

Report a problem with this skill