Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

analyzing-insurance-financials

Structures insurance company financial analysis with combined ratio, reserve adequacy, and capital metrics. Use when analyzing insurance financials, evaluating combined ratios, or assessing reserve strength.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Analyzing Insurance Financials

Structures insurance company financial analysis around underwriting profitability, reserve adequacy, investment performance, and capital strength to produce actionable assessments of insurer financial health.

When To Use

  • Evaluating an insurer's underwriting discipline via combined ratio decomposition
  • Assessing loss reserve adequacy for due diligence, M&A, or regulatory review
  • Benchmarking capital and solvency metrics against rating agency thresholds
  • Analyzing reinsurance program effectiveness and net retention exposure
  • Reviewing statutory filings (Annual Statement, Quarterly Statement) or GAAP financials for trend analysis
  • Supporting investment decisions in insurance equities, surplus notes, or ILS

Inputs To Gather

  • Financial statements: Statutory Annual/Quarterly Statements (filed with NAIC), GAAP 10-K/10-Q, or IFRS 17 reports
  • Line-of-business detail: Schedule P (loss development triangles), Schedule H (accident & health), or equivalent breakdowns
  • Investment portfolio: Schedule D (bonds), Schedule BA (other invested assets), asset quality distribution
  • Reinsurance structure: Schedule F (ceded reinsurance), Schedule S (reinsurance assumed), treaty summaries
  • Rating agency reports: AM Best, S&P, Moody's, or Fitch insurer financial strength ratings and rationale
  • Peer/industry benchmarks: NAIC industry aggregates, SNL/S&P Capital IQ comparables, or relevant cohort data
  • Time horizon: Minimum 3-5 years of historical data for trend analysis; 10 years preferred for reserve development

Workflow

  1. Classify the insurer — Identify line mix (P&C vs. life/health vs. multiline), domicile, and regulatory regime. Note whether analysis uses statutory accounting (SAP), GAAP, or IFRS 17. [VERIFY] applicable accounting framework and jurisdictional requirements.

  2. Decompose the combined ratio

    • Calculate loss ratio (net incurred losses / net earned premiums) by accident year and calendar year
    • Calculate expense ratio (underwriting expenses / net written premiums for SAP; / net earned premiums for GAAP trade ratio)
    • Break out loss adjustment expense (LAE) into defense & cost containment (DCC) vs. adjusting & other (A&O)
    • Compute combined ratio = loss ratio + expense ratio; flag any result above 100% (underwriting loss)
    • Analyze trends over 3-5 years; identify deteriorating or improving lines of business
  3. Evaluate reserve adequacy

    • Review Schedule P loss development triangles (paid and incurred) for the most recent 10 accident years
    • Calculate development factors and compare to industry benchmarks
    • Identify adverse or favorable prior-year reserve development and quantify impact on calendar-year results
    • Assess carried reserves vs. actuarial central estimate — note any margin (redundancy) or deficiency
    • Flag lines with long-tail exposure (e.g., general liability, workers' comp, professional liability) for deeper review
  4. Analyze investment portfolio and yield

    • Compute net investment income yield (NII / average invested assets)
    • Review asset allocation: percentage in investment-grade bonds, equities, alternatives, real estate, cash
    • Assess credit quality distribution (NAIC designation 1-6 for statutory; rating agency equivalents)
    • Calculate total return on invested assets including realized/unrealized gains
    • Evaluate asset-liability duration matching — flag significant mismatches
  5. Assess capital adequacy and leverage

    • Calculate net premiums written to policyholders' surplus (NPW/PHS) — flag if >3:1 for P&C [VERIFY] threshold by line
    • Review Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio (Total Adjusted Capital / Authorized Control Level) — regulatory minimum is 200% company action level
    • Compute net leverage ratio (net liabilities / PHS) and gross leverage including reinsurance recoverables
    • Analyze quality of surplus: note any surplus notes, goodwill, DTA, or non-admitted assets reducing adjusted surplus
    • Compare to AM Best Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) thresholds for target rating level
  6. Evaluate reinsurance program

    • Assess ceded ratio (ceded premiums / gross written premiums) — high cession may indicate capital constraints
    • Review reinsurer credit quality and concentration risk (Schedule F penalties for unauthorized/undercollateralized reinsurers)
    • Analyze net retention relative to surplus for catastrophe and per-risk exposures
    • Identify any commutation activity or material disputes in reinsurance recoverables
  7. Benchmark and synthesize

    • Compare all key metrics to peer group and industry medians
    • Identify outlier metrics (positive or negative) and explain drivers
    • Assign qualitative assessment of financial strength: strong / adequate / marginal / weak
    • Highlight key risks: reserve uncertainty, catastrophe exposure, investment concentration, reinsurance dependency

Output

Structure the analysis report with the following sections:

  • Executive Summary: One-paragraph financial health assessment with key metrics and conclusion
  • Company Profile: Line mix, domicile, size (DPW, total assets, surplus), rating history
  • Underwriting Analysis: Combined ratio decomposition with 3-5 year trend tables by line
  • Reserve Analysis: Development triangle summary, prior-year development history, adequacy assessment
  • Investment Analysis: Portfolio composition, yield analysis, credit quality, duration
  • Capital & Leverage: RBC ratio, NPW/PHS, net leverage, surplus quality, BCAR positioning
  • Reinsurance Review: Ceded ratio, reinsurer quality, net retention adequacy
  • Peer Comparison: Side-by-side table of key metrics vs. selected comparables
  • Key Risks & Considerations: Bullet list of material risk factors with severity indication
  • Appendix: Supporting schedules, data sources, glossary of metrics

Quality Checks

  • Confirm all ratios use consistent numerator/denominator definitions (SAP vs. GAAP vs. trade basis) — do not mix frameworks
  • Verify that loss development triangles foot to Schedule P Part 1 summary and that incurred = paid + case reserves + IBNR
  • Cross-check that NPW reconciles across the income statement, balance sheet, and Schedule T (state page)
  • Ensure RBC ratio uses the correct formula for entity type (P&C vs. life vs. health) [VERIFY]
  • Validate that reinsurance recoverables on the balance sheet tie to Schedule F detail
  • Confirm peer benchmarks are from the same reporting period and use the same accounting basis
  • Flag any metric where data was estimated, interpolated, or unavailable with [VERIFY]
  • Check that all trend commentary is supported by the underlying numerical data — no unsupported qualitative claims

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills80Updated Jul 12, 2026

See all skills by FDU-INS

Report a problem with this skill