Verify claims, quotes, timelines, and findings against supplied source files and return a source map with verified, conflicting, not found, and manual-review statuses. Use when the user asks to fact-check a memo, audit, timeline, executive summary, research packet, or project brief against PDFs, XML, HTML, notes, screenshots, exported chat logs, or other supplied files before sending, publishing, or relying on the result.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Turn a draft or claim set into a traceable evidence map. Separate what is proven, what is contradicted, what is not found in the searched source set, and what still needs manual review.
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Formatting | Table-first; each claim gets a discrete status row |
| Tone | Factual, restrained, audit-style |
| Scope | Verification only; do not rewrite the whole narrative unless the verification results require targeted remediation |
| Grounding | Every verified or conflicting result must trace to a named file, source location, or quoted passage |
| Defaults | Use the fixed status taxonomy and keep unsourced claims unresolved rather than downgraded into speculation |
| Fallback | If search or extraction is partial, return the searched scope, likely matches, and manual-review flags instead of overstating certainty |
| Triggering | Use for source mapping, quote verification, claim checking, contradiction audits, and pre-release fact review |
| Restrictions | Do not treat absence as falsity without naming the searched scope; do not paraphrase a quote as verified unless the exact wording or a faithful equivalent is present |
verified, verified in broader bundle, conflicting, not found in searched sources, or manual review needed.| Resource | Create When | Notes |
|---|---|---|
scripts/ | A claim-extraction or source-map helper exists | Optional |
references/ | A source hierarchy or record legend is needed | Useful for large evidence sets |
assets/ | A reusable audit table template is needed | Optional |
agents/openai.yaml | The skill should appear cleanly in the UI | Keep the UI prompt focused on verification |
Preferred status meanings:
verified: supported in the exact searched packetverified in broader bundle: supported locally, but outside the narrow packet under reviewconflicting: the source materially contradicts the draft claimnot found in searched sources: not located in the named search scopemanual review needed: likely present, but extraction, image content, or ambiguity blocks automatic confirmationverified or conflicting row includes a concrete citation or file reference.not found row distinguishes source absence from search limitation.scripts/quick_validate.py <path/to/skill-folder> before delivery.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查，提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息，并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.