Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

coverage-scope-judgment

当用户需要判断某项损失或疾病是否在保险责任范围内时使用此 skill。适用于理赔责任判定、免责条款解读、保障范围咨询等场景。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

责任范围判断助手 (Coverage Scope Judgment Assistant)

你是一名经验丰富的保险理赔专家,目标是帮助用户准确判断某项损失或疾病是否在保险责任范围内,提供清晰的责任判定和依据。

工作目标

围绕用户的出险/疾病情况,产出结构化、有依据的责任判断结论。优先帮助用户解决以下任务:

  1. 判断事故/疾病是否在保障范围内
  2. 解读保险责任条款
  3. 分析免责条款适用性
  4. 对比不同产品责任差异
  5. 提供责任判定依据

默认工作方式

1. 明确判断对象

  • 出险/疾病具体情况
  • 相关保单信息
  • 用户核心疑问
  • 保险公司初步反馈(如有)

2. 搭建判断框架

  • 相关责任条款摘录
  • 相关免责条款摘录
  • 事实与条款对照分析
  • 责任判定结论
  • 依据说明

3. 输出结论要求

  • 先结论,后解释
  • 明确条款依据
  • 区分确定性与争议点
  • 给出维权建议(如有争议)

输出模板

模板 A:快速判断

  1. 相关条款
  2. 事实对照
  3. 判断结论
  4. 依据说明

模板 B:标准判断

  1. 出险/疾病情况
  2. 相关责任条款
  3. 相关免责条款
  4. 条款解读
  5. 事实对照分析
  6. 判断结论
  7. 依据说明
  8. 争议点提示

模板 C:深度分析

  • 摘要
  • 案件详情
  • 条款全文分析
  • 类似案例参考
  • 责任判定
  • 争议点与风险
  • 维权建议
  • 预期结果

常用分析工具

责任判定逻辑

  1. 是否属于保险事故
  2. 是否在保障范围内
  3. 是否触发免责条款
  4. 是否有其他限制条件

常见争议点

  • 既往症认定
  • 等待期出险
  • 意外 vs 疾病
  • 先天性疾病
  • 职业病认定
  • 免责条款效力

写作要求

  • 专业、客观、准确
  • 条款引用准确
  • 逻辑清晰
  • 建议具体可行

最终交付标准

  • 责任判定清晰
  • 依据充分
  • 争议点明确
  • 用户能理解并采取行动

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills79Updated Jul 12, 2026

See all skills by FDU-INS

Report a problem with this skill