Verification before completion claims. Use when about to say "done", "fixed", or "complete". Runs checklist by workflow type with evidence requirements.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Verify before claiming completion.
Before claiming: "done", "fixed", "complete", "working", "ready"
Run before substantial work begins. Blocks execution if missing.
□ Verification method locked (not "assumption")
→ What type: execution output / observation / measurement?
→ What evidence will you show?
□ At least 2 "must NOT" criteria exist
→ What should this NOT do?
→ What scope should NOT expand?
□ Fit score determined workflow shape
→ <25: BLOCKED - clarify first
→ 25-29: Colleague-shaped (iterate each step)
→ 30-39: Tool-with-review (checkpoint major steps)
→ 40+: Tool-shaped (milestones only)
If any missing: STOP. Complete before proceeding.
□ Feature executes without errors (show output)
□ Edge cases tested (empty, null, boundary)
□ Rollback tested if Type 2B/1
□ Dependencies verified
□ Root cause identified with evidence
□ Fix tested and resolves symptom
□ Prevention added (test/automation/guard)
□ Related bugs checked (same class)
□ Existing tests pass unchanged
□ Behavior identical (output comparison)
□ Deletion complete (no orphans)
□ No new abstraction without justification
| Type | Description | Sufficient for SHIP? |
|---|---|---|
execution output | Ran command, showed result | ✓ Yes |
observation | Screenshot, debugger session | ✓ Yes |
measurement | Metrics, benchmark data | ✓ Yes |
reasoned inference | Logic-based conclusion | ⚠️ Flag, don't block |
code review | Inspection only | ⚠️ Weak |
assumption | Not verified | ⚠️ Flag with warning |
Default: Require execution output, observation, or measurement before completion claims.
Gates advise, never prevent. User owns their work.
Gate exists to surface risk, not to block legitimate intuition.
Before claiming completion, define how you'll verify:
| Verification Type | Evidence Required | Time Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Execution output | Command output, test results | < 1 min |
| Observation | Screenshot, debugger inspection | 1-5 min |
| Measurement | Metrics, benchmarks, profiling | 5-15 min |
| Code review | Manual inspection only | Variable |
| Assumption | No verification | 0 (blocks SHIP) |
| Stakes | Minimum Verification |
|---|---|
| High | Execution output + Observation |
| Medium | Execution output |
| Low | Code review acceptable |
| Claim | Problem | Required |
|---|---|---|
| "Should work" | Speculation | Actual output |
| "Looks good" | No verification | Test results |
| "Fixed the issue" | No proof | Before/after |
| "I think this resolves it" | No confidence % | X-Y% + basis |
When blocked, state:
Trivial changes (< 1 min rollback): completion allowed without full gate. Document undo command.
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The tests passed" | Tests ≠ verification. Did you run the ACTUAL command? |
| "It should work" | "Should" = assumption. Show evidence. |
| "I already checked" | When? Show the output. |
| "The user is waiting" | Rushed verification = rework later. |
| "It's a simple change" | Simple changes break production too. |
| "I'm pretty sure it works" | Pretty sure ≠ evidence. Run it. |
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查，提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息，并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.