Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ev-benchmark-verification

Phase 2B of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Verifies benchmark-result rows and benchmark-source candidates against registry/benchmark-sources.json before adversarial audit, link validation, catalog promotion, or ingestion. Use when running /ev-pipeline, checking benchmark-result evidence, reviewing benchmark-source candidates, or preparing benchmark rows for /gaia-ingest-batch.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Benchmark-Source Verification (ev-benchmark-verification)

Phase 2B runs after /ev-star-verification and before /ev-adversarial-audit. It is benchmark-only and read-only: it classifies existing benchmark-result registry rows and optional benchmark-source candidate manifests without mutating the registry, the catalog, or the evidence lake.

Policy

registry/benchmark-sources.json is the benchmark allow/blacklist surface. Current lanes collapse to three values:

  • verified — CI-reproduced or verifier-attested benchmark evidence; Trust Magnitude lane multiplier 2.0x.
  • reported — public claim or mirrored leaderboard evidence accepted by the human gate; Trust Magnitude lane multiplier 1.0x.
  • rejected — blacklisted, disputed, pending, retired, candidate, unknown, or otherwise not approved; Trust Magnitude multiplier 0x.

Legacy aliases are accepted during migration: ci-reproduced and verifier-attested normalize to verified; mirrored normalizes to reported; pending, unknown, retired, and candidate normalize to rejected/no scoring. A catalog entry with status: rejected is the blacklist and always scores zero.

Reported rows do not need runAt, datasetHash, or benchmarkInputHash. Verified rows still need reproducibility fields. appliesToGenericSkillRefs records which generic skill IDs a benchmark applies to; it does not create a named-skill score by itself.

Command

PYTHONPATH=src python evidence/scripts/verify_benchmark_sources.py \
  --catalog registry/benchmark-sources.json \
  --registry-root . \
  --check \
  --report /tmp/ev-phase2b-benchmark-report.md

With candidate sources discovered during Phase 0 or issue review:

PYTHONPATH=src python evidence/scripts/verify_benchmark_sources.py \
  --catalog registry/benchmark-sources.json \
  --registry-root . \
  --candidate-manifest /tmp/benchmark-candidates.jsonl \
  --check \
  --report /tmp/ev-phase2b-benchmark-report.md

Candidate manifest entries may be JSON or JSONL objects with fields such as:

{
  "target": "firecrawl/firecrawl-research-index",
  "source": "https://www.firecrawl.dev/blog/research-index-launch",
  "benchmarkId": "alphaxiv-arxivqa@v1.0",
  "status": "candidate",
  "missing": [],
  "notes": "Candidate becomes reported only after the human gate approves it."
}

Firecrawl Research Index / alphaXiv ArXivQA is the model case: a public reported benchmark can count at 1.0x after the human gate, but a candidate report alone is not permission to ingest.

Human gate

Machines classify. Humans approve or reject.

After Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, Phase 3 adversarial audit, and Phase 4 link validation, stop before benchmark catalog promotion or /gaia-ingest-batch. A human reviewer must approve reported benchmark evidence or mark it rejected/blacklisted. Do not treat a green Phase 2B report as permission to ingest.

Output

The report summarizes:

  • scoring-eligible rows that may count toward Trust Magnitude.
  • reported, rejected-row, candidate-only, blocked, and unknown-benchmark rows that need human review or score zero.
  • rejected/retired usage and scoring-lane misuse as hard blockers.
  • missing verified-lane reproducibility fields and malformed percentiles as findings.

Candidate-only manifest entries are never hard blockers by themselves; they are backlog items for human review.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Measure CI churn cost for a pull request: how many commits and how many CI-compute seconds were burned on avoidable "fix the CI" push rounds. Use when you want to understand the efficiency cost of a PR's iteration cycle, get actionable pre-push check suggestions, or include a churn summary in a pipeline report. Triggers: "ci churn", "how much CI did we burn", "avoidable commits", "ci efficiency", "wasted CI time", "churn report", "/ci-churn". Called automatically by /fp-drift at pipeline close.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

One-fix-at-a-time, approval-gated design fix recovery. Given a checklist of fixes (handover doc, CHECKLIST.md, or inline list), applies each individually, presents a diff, and waits for an explicit APPROVE / REJECT / NO CHANGES decision before committing. Trigger phrases: /design-iteration, "go through the checklist one by one", "fix these one at a time", "bucket recovery", "design fix pass".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

Playbook for correcting a named skill's star level to match its computed Trust Magnitude grade, with an independent post-calibration verification pass and a CLI-logged timeline event (never hand-written). Use when: recalibrating a skill's level, fixing a stale or drifted star rating, running a batch of `gaia dev calibrate` corrections, or confirming a past calibration actually landed. Triggers: "calibrate <skill>", "recalibrate the trust magnitude backlog", "promote/demote <skill> to N stars", "why is <skill> still N stars", "verify a calibration actually landed", "Hall of Heroes ranking is wrong".

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

Close out a completed EPIC / sprint end-to-end: author a fact-verified meta-post announcing what shipped, archive the EPIC's handovers, snapshot orchestrator memory, gate the integration→main merge on CI-green + explicit human go, drive the version bump (merge-commit conventions that auto-sync classifies), and verify the release reached the registry/PyPI. Use when the user says "close out EPIC <n>", "wrap up the sprint", "ship the meta shift", "/epic-close", or asks to finalize an integration branch that is ready to merge to main. Generalizes the EPIC 1002 (Yggdrasil II) close-out. This skill orchestrates — it authors founder docs directly (superadmin) and delegates code/regen to workers; it NEVER merges to main without the human gate.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

Run this skill for Phase 3 of the evidence verification pipeline — the adversarial audit step. Use when you need to check the evidence data lake for bad data before ingestion: dead links, wrong URL formats (tree/ vs blob/), subjective wording ("elite", "high-quality"), stale migration notes, benchmark catalog misuse/vendor-claim leakage, or skills whose star evidence conflicts with classified evidence level. Triggers on phrases like: "audit the data lake", "adversarial check", "ev-adversarial-audit", "check for noise in evidence", "flag bad evidence", "run the audit phase", "quality check the by-type files", or any reference to Phase 3 of the pipeline.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gaia-research/gaia-skill-tree23Updated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by gaia-research

Report a problem with this skill