Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

acreadiness-policy

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

OriginalShow the original description

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

See how to install

Good for

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
  • Enforce readiness requirements in CI

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

/acreadiness-policy — AgentRC policies

Use this skill when the user asks about policies, strict mode, custom scoring, disabling checks, org standards, or CI gating of readiness.

A policy is a small JSON file with three optional sections — criteria, extras, thresholds — that customise how AgentRC scores readiness.

Built-in examples

AgentRC ships with three example policies in examples/policies/:

PolicyWhat it does
strict.json100% pass rate, raises impact on key criteria
ai-only.jsonDisables all repo-health checks, focuses on AI tooling
repo-health-only.jsonDisables AI checks, focuses on traditional quality

Recommend these as starting points before writing a custom policy.

Policy schema

{
  "name": "my-policy",
  "criteria": {
    "disable":  ["env-example", "observability", "dependabot"],
    "override": {
      "readme":      { "impact": "high", "level": 2 },
      "lint-config": { "title": "Linter required" }
    }
  },
  "extras": {
    "disable": ["pre-commit"]
  },
  "thresholds": {
    "passRate": 0.9
  }
}

Impact weights

ImpactWeight
critical5
high4
medium3
low2
info0

Score = 1 − (deductions / max possible weight). Grades: A ≥ 0.9, B ≥ 0.8, C ≥ 0.7, D ≥ 0.6, F < 0.6.

Sub-commands

show

List policies currently in effect (from agentrc.config.json policies array, or none).

new <name>

Scaffold policies/<name>.json with sensible defaults. Walk the user through:

  1. What to disable — irrelevant pillars or extras for their stack (e.g. disable observability for a static site).
  2. What to raise — override impact to high or critical for must-haves (e.g. readme, codeowners).
  3. Pass-rate threshold — typical org baselines: 0.7 (lenient), 0.85 (standard), 1.0 (strict).
  4. Reference the policy from agentrc.config.json:
    { "policies": ["./policies/<name>.json"] }
    

apply <path-or-pkg>

Run agentrc readiness --json --policy <source> and re-render the report by handing off to the assess skill / ai-readiness-reporter agent. Supports chaining:

npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json --policy ./org-baseline.json,./team-frontend.json

CI gating

Combine policies with --fail-level to enforce a minimum maturity level in CI:

- run: npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --policy ./policies/strict.json --fail-level 3

Advanced

JSON policies can disable, override, and set thresholds — but cannot add new criteria. For new detection logic, point users at AgentRC's TypeScript plugin system (docs/dev/plugins.md).

Operating rules

  • Never silently disable a pillar. If the user wants to disable observability, confirm and explain the trade-off.
  • Prefer overriding impact over disabling. Disabling hides the gap entirely; overriding lets it still appear in the report.
  • Recommend extras stay enabled. They cost nothing — they don't affect the score.
  • Suggest layering — most orgs want a baseline policy + per-team overrides chained with --policy a.json,b.json.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Create and fix Adobe Illustrator automation scripts using ExtendScript, Adobe’s JavaScript-based scripting language. Automate changes to artwork, text, layers, and artboards, process multiple files, and prepare exports such as PDF, SVG, and PNG.

  • Automate repeated changes to artwork and text
  • Export multiple Illustrator files
  • Generate artwork variations from data
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill