Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

notification-routing

Design notification routing that sends agent messages to channels by topic, such as security, releases, or daily digests. Use shared configuration and message tags to keep important alerts visible among routine updates.

OriginalShow the original description

Route agent notifications to specific channels by type — prevent alert fatigue from single-channel flooding

Works withSlack
See how to install

Good for

  • Separate urgent alerts from daily reports
  • Send security findings to a dedicated channel
  • Share notification destinations across an agent team
  • Change messaging platforms while retaining routing rules

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Context

When a Squad grows beyond a few agents, notifications flood a single channel — failure alerts drown in daily briefings, tech news buries security findings, and everything gets ignored. This is the pub-sub problem: a single message queue for everything is a recipe for missed alerts.

The fix is topic-based routing: agents tag notifications with a channel type, and a routing function sends them to the appropriate destination.

Trigger symptoms:

  • Important alerts missed because they're buried in routine notifications
  • Team members turning off notifications entirely (signal overwhelm)
  • Onboarding friction: "where do I look for X?"

Patterns

Channel Config Schema

Define a .squad/teams-channels.json (or equivalent) mapping notification types to channel identifiers:

{
  "teamId": "your-team-id",
  "channels": {
    "notifications": "squad-alerts",
    "tech-news":     "tech-news",
    "security":      "security-findings",
    "releases":      "release-announcements",
    "daily-digest":  "daily-digest"
  }
}

Place this in .squad/ (git-tracked, shared across the team). For platforms that use channel IDs instead of names (Teams, Slack), store the resolved ID alongside the name to avoid name-collision bugs:

{
  "channels": {
    "notifications": { "name": "squad-alerts", "id": "channel-id-opaque-string" }
  }
}

CHANNEL: Tag Convention

Agents prefix their output with CHANNEL:<type> to signal where the notification should go:

CHANNEL:security
Worf found 3 new CVEs in dependency scan: lodash@4.17.15, minimist@1.2.5

Routing Dispatcher (shell pseudocode)

dispatch_notification() {
  local raw_output="$1"
  local channel="notifications"  # default

  if echo "$raw_output" | grep -qE '^CHANNEL:[a-z][a-z0-9-]*'; then
    channel=$(echo "$raw_output" | head -1 | cut -d: -f2)
    raw_output=$(echo "$raw_output" | tail -n +2)
  fi

  send_notification --channel "$channel" --message "$raw_output"
}

Provider-Agnostic Adapter

The routing layer is provider-agnostic. Plug in your platform adapter:

.squad/notify-adapter.sh   # Teams / Slack / Discord / webhook -- swappable

The routing config and CHANNEL: tags never change. Only the adapter changes per deployment.

Anti-Patterns

Never send all notification types to one channel:

send_notification --channel "general" --message "$anything"

Never use display names as identifiers (name collision risk):

send_to_team --name "Squad" --channel "notifications"

Resolve channel IDs once at setup. Use IDs at runtime.

Distributed Systems Pattern

This is pub-sub with topic routing -- the same principle as Kafka topics, RabbitMQ routing keys, and AWS SNS topic filtering. Route by type. Each consumer subscribes to the topics it cares about.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Coordinate work across AI agents with shared rules for locating team files, recording decisions and their reasons, and requesting help. It also defines who owns revisions after a reviewer rejects an artifact.

  • Locate team files across separate working directories
  • Record decisions that affect other agents
  • Request input from another specialist
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

agent-conduct

FreeSummary

Set shared development rules for an agent team: keep specific agent names out of product code, tests, and CI configuration, verify affected tests before finishing, and record lessons learned from mistakes.

  • Share development rules across multiple agents
  • Keep team-specific agent names out of code and tests
  • Check affected tests before declaring work complete
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Routes requests to design, create, update, debug, or upgrade GitHub Agentic Workflows to the appropriate instructions. It helps the agent select a workflow-specific procedure and apply any additional rules defined for the repository.

  • Designing a new workflow through questions
  • Investigating failed runs and recurring errors
  • Upgrading workflows and addressing deprecations
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Prepare architecture proposals before implementation so the team can agree on a direction. Organize evidence, technical choices, effects on existing work, risks, and the first release’s scope into a document with clear recommendations and decision owners.

  • Proposing a major architecture change
  • Replanning milestones after a foundation change
  • Comparing technical options before seeking approval
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Update the gh-aw-firewall version used by gh-aw, rebuild generated files, and review release notes and configuration schemas, which define valid settings. It guides related code and test updates while identifying follow-up work that remains.

  • Updating the firewall version used by gh-aw
  • Reviewing release notes for integration changes
  • Checking configuration schema differences
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

Review git and gh operations in gh-aw workflows to check credential availability for each repository. Identify missing token handoffs, risky expansions of limited checkouts, and error handling needed where credentials are intentionally unavailable.

  • Reviewing git operations after repository checkout
  • Checking tokens for private cross-repository access
  • Reviewing sparse and shallow checkout changes
github/gh-aw5.4KUpdated Oct 19, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill