Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Publish validated gh-aw changes as a draft pull request from a cloud agent.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Publish the current gh-aw branch as a draft pull request from a GitHub Copilot cloud agent after the repository's required validation and push steps have completed.
Package the repository's repeated publish flow into one reusable skill so agents stop improvising gh pr create sequences and consistently use local validation, report_progress, and the runtime pull-request tool.
Use this skill when the current branch contains the intended changes, the run can call both report_progress and create_pull_request, and the task is to open or update one gh-aw pull request rather than finish an existing review cycle.
Inputs: a PR title, summary, optional draft flag, and any repository-specific validation notes. Outputs: pushed branch state via report_progress, one created or updated draft pull request, and a short publication summary that names the validation that ran.
Before publishing, inspect the repository for a pull-request template and follow it when present. Run repository-specific preparation before the final push: make fmt after Go changes, make recompile after workflow markdown changes, make agent-report-progress-no-test before any intermediate report_progress, and make agent-report-progress before the final report_progress. Use report_progress to commit and push the branch, then call create_pull_request exactly once to open the PR. Prefer draft mode by default. Never use gh pr create, direct git push, or ad hoc publication commands from bash in cloud-agent runs.
Success means the working tree is published through report_progress, the final validation target finished without unresolved errors, and exactly one draft pull request exists for the branch with a body that summarizes changes and validation. Stop after publication; use pr-finisher for review-thread or merge-readiness work.
gh pr create or direct Git pushes from bash.make agent-report-progress before the final publish push.report_progress pushes changes but does not open a pull request.create_pull_request opens the PR but does not run validation or push files.AGENTS.md.github/skills/developer/SKILL.mdMakefile targets make fmt, make recompile, make agent-report-progress-no-test, and make agent-report-progressreport_progress and create_pull_request.github/skills/pr-finisher/SKILL.md for post-publication follow-upThis skill covers publication of a new or updated pull request for the current branch. It does not decide feature scope, resolve review comments, re-run CI, or merge the pull request.
Abstraction level: compositional
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Standard collaboration patterns for all squad agents — worktree awareness, decisions, cross-agent communication
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Shared hard rules enforced across all squad agents
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Route gh-aw design, creation, diagnosis, patching, active debugging, and upgrade requests to the right strategies.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Upgrade gh-aw to latest gh-aw-firewall release and identify follow-up spec tasks.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Review code that performs git or gh operations against repository checkouts in gh-aw, checking that the right credentials are available at the right time and that sparseness, shallowness and credential-free factors are properly considered.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.