Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

improve-search-visibility-page-and-foundation-check

This playbook step audits site indexing, crawling, technical foundations, and page-level search issues at a requested scope. It can also compare pages against search results for lost visibility questions, then records findings and candidate fixes without changing the live site.

OriginalShow the original description

Step of the improve-search-visibility playbook: audits site indexing, crawling, technical and page issues at the requested scope, or checks pages behind lost visibility questions. Run improve-search-visibility instead; not for direct use.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,272 stars(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)
Works withSearch Console

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Auditing indexing and crawling across a site
  • Checking page-level SEO issues
  • Investigating lost visibility for specific search questions
  • Preparing a developer checklist for unchecked items

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.1 KB
  • skill.meta.json256 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

page-and-foundation-check

Reads: ../improve-search-visibility/references/foundation-check.md, ../improve-search-visibility/references/gap-to-fix.md; the requested audit scope (../improve-search-visibility/references/seo-jobs.md) or gap rows and nearest pages for a visibility check; sitemap/crawl inventory and Search Console export when available.

Does (free checks first): 0. Find the pages. gooseworks:knowledge_import in its website discover mode lists up to 25 same-site pages for free; use these as starting leads, then inventory the requested scope from sitemaps/feeds/indexes or crawl exports; 25 is not the site's page limit. Import mode only when the host cannot fetch pages at all: the needed selected pages, only inside the same ceiling the human agreed (the import's own cap described in words, per the spend gate), then read them with gooseworks:knowledge_search.

  1. Site-wide once (free): fetch robots.txt and classify every rule by retrieval vs training bot; with a shell, test CDN blocking by requesting a page as OAI-SearchBot and PerplexityBot vs a normal agent (no shell → not checked, developer checklist); sitemap; duplicate platform host; Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools set up (from intake). Indexing comes from Search Console if shared, else from the one paid site: probe of the credit flow (step 4).
  2. Per page: status and redirects, canonical, robots meta and header, content visible without JavaScript, title/H1/meta, the answer-first opening, structured data validity and match with visible text, field speed data where available, internal links in.
  3. Compare with the winner (when relevant to the job): for each lost key question, the passage the engine lifted from the winning page vs the brand's page — what the winner states that the brand does not.
  4. Near-winners: from available Search Console or clearly labelled managed SEO/query evidence, queries around positions 4–15; high impressions/low click rate only from own performance data. For an audit, include relevant queries beyond a prior AI question set.
  5. For technical audits, include the foundation reference's applicable migration, facet, rendering and competing-page checks. State sample coverage; implement nothing live. Mark everything pass / fail / not checked. Use the host's own fetch or shell; what it cannot see goes to a short developer checklist — never a technical question to the human. Read the theme's existing structured data before proposing any.

Writes: the foundation table and per-page notes for the report; candidate fixes (blockers flagged) for fix ranking. Never: marks an item passed that it did not see; proposes a structural change (robots, redirects, noindex, URL change) as anything but a proposal with risk and undo.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<slug>

FreeSummary

The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.

  • No use case can be identified from the supplied material
  • Purpose is unspecified
  • Inputs and expected results are unspecified
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-angle-miner

FreeSummary

Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.

  • Finding evidence-backed angles for a product campaign
  • Developing static ad or video concepts from customer research
  • Writing headline and primary-text options for ads
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.

  • Finding campaigns and ads that waste budget
  • Comparing performance across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn
  • Planning specific budget shifts and follow-up tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.

  • Compare true qualified-lead costs across creatives
  • Find low-CPA ads that bring poor-quality leads
  • Check whether signups can be linked to downstream outcomes
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.

  • Prepare a Meta ad campaign when brand facts are missing
  • Clarify budget and timing before campaign planning
  • Record approved claims and audience restrictions
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-policy-check

FreeSummary

Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.

  • Checking ad copy and visuals before launch
  • Reviewing creator ads for required disclosures
  • Fixing a platform disapproval and recording the issue
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill