Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

research-audience-fit-definition

Draft a searchable definition for an audience or prospect list using a brand’s website, customer information, and request. The result specifies who fits, who to exclude, and an appropriate list size, while marking assumptions for later correction. This is a step within the research-audience playbook.

OriginalShow the original description

Step of the research-audience playbook: drafts the searchable fit definition, exclusions and list size that the list run then searches on. Run research-audience instead; not for direct use.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,272 stars(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Defining target companies for prospect research
  • Turning buyer groups into searchable criteria
  • Setting exclusions for an outreach list
  • Drafting list size and fit assumptions

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB
  • skill.meta.json428 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

fit-definition

Reads: the brand's own site in the host browser (what it sells, pricing, case studies, customer logos, integrations, who it says it's for); brand_read summary/onboarding/competitors/learnings; knowledge_search for ICP, segments, win/loss, customers, past outbound; the saved fit definition; the saved buyer groups (research/audience/buyer-groups.md) — the lead group, or the one the ask names, is the starting definition; the ask itself; ../research-audience/references/fit-and-scoring.md; ../research-audience/references/list-by-company-type.md. No answers from the human yet — this atom drafts.

Does:

  1. Identify the motion (who the list is for — usually already in the request) and pick the list unit from the company-type table. Several motions → one definition each. Retail, wholesale and venue lists use the retail variant (door count, price tier, assortment, review window, chain vs independent route).
  2. Fill every part of the definition table from the site, the brain and the ask. Mark each line sourced (with its link or brain item) or assumed (your best reading, with why). Never leave a line blank to ask about — assume it, label it, and let the human correct it in the report's message.
  3. Turn loss notes and "not a fit" replies into the negative ICP.
  4. Translate personas into title synonyms and seniority by company size. Hiring-led lists: write the role map (replaces / augments / buys / champions / uses, and the job-ad keywords that confirm relevance) — ../research-audience/references/list-sources.md § Hiring.
  5. Load exclusions: the human's files (customers, open deals, do-not-contact; for retail, the brand's current stockists), the contacted ledger and suppression, competitor domains from competitor_read (never names or handles — they can be mis-resolved), the seller's own domain. Normalise to root domains.
  6. Account value (account-based lists): set the V1/V2/V3 rule from the brand's pricing page and customer logos (seats, locations, plan tiers), labelled assumed; the human corrects it later.
  7. Size: what the human asked for, checked against what they can work; partner and app lists default to 20–30 — say what a bigger number does to fit.
  8. No ICP anywhere: draft from what the brand sells and its customer logos; where two readings are equally likely, build the free pass on the stronger one and name the other in the report as an alternative.
  9. Write the draft definition as one compact block for the report, assumed lines first, and say what any open line will do to the list. Do not wait for a yes — the free pass runs on the draft.

Writes: the definition (markdown, assumed lines labelled) for the run, updated with the human's corrections, and later the saved brand document through the save-to-brain skill (../save-to-brain/SKILL.md) (see SKILL.md write-back).

Rules: after the human corrects it, never widen or narrow it again without saying so. Never invent customers, logos or loss reasons. Never copy values from the reference's fictional example.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<slug>

FreeSummary

The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.

  • No use case can be identified from the supplied material
  • Purpose is unspecified
  • Inputs and expected results are unspecified
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-angle-miner

FreeSummary

Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.

  • Finding evidence-backed angles for a product campaign
  • Developing static ad or video concepts from customer research
  • Writing headline and primary-text options for ads
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.

  • Finding campaigns and ads that waste budget
  • Comparing performance across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn
  • Planning specific budget shifts and follow-up tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.

  • Compare true qualified-lead costs across creatives
  • Find low-CPA ads that bring poor-quality leads
  • Check whether signups can be linked to downstream outcomes
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.

  • Prepare a Meta ad campaign when brand facts are missing
  • Clarify budget and timing before campaign planning
  • Record approved claims and audience restrictions
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-policy-check

FreeSummary

Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.

  • Checking ad copy and visuals before launch
  • Reviewing creator ads for required disclosures
  • Fixing a platform disapproval and recording the issue
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill