Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

spend-gate

A shared approval step for marketing workflows that may spend credits. It presents quoted prices or asks for one approved ceiling for paid data reads, tracks each charge within that limit, and sets spending rules for scheduled runs.

OriginalShow the original description

Shared step of the marketing playbooks (make-static-ads, research-market, run-paid-campaigns, work-with-creators): gets the human's yes before any credits are spent. Shows the price exactly as quoted, or asks for one yes to a credit ceiling for paid data reads, stays under it and logs each charge. Also covers scheduled runs. Loaded by those playbooks; not for direct use.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,272 stars(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)
Works withTikTok

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Approving a quoted ad or media production cost
  • Setting a credit ceiling for paid research reads
  • Tracking charges during an approved data top-up
  • Setting per-run spending limits for scheduled workflows

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • proxy-endpoints.md9.6 KB
  • skill.meta.json700 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

spend-gate

No credit is spent before the human's yes in this conversation. Money is always a credit number exactly as GooseWorks gives it — never dollars, never your own total presented as a price. Never name tools, endpoints or vendors to the marketer: describe the work in plain words ("Reddit threads about dog allergies, newest first").

Pick the branch by the tool:

A. Engine-quoted work (ads, photos, video, any tool with a dry run or a price check)

Managed marketing data: marketing_data_describe is free. marketing_data_lookup defaults to quote_only: true. Read the returned maximum credits and expiry, then request approval for that exact bounded work. Submit the same request with its quote token, the approved ceiling and the user’s words. A new request or expired quote needs a fresh quote. An existing approval may cover later calls only when it explicitly named that same bounded plan and total ceiling: quote each call, preserve the original approval words, and set its maximum no higher than the remaining approved credits. Ask again only for changed scope or more budget. Log every returned charge and deduct it before the next call; the tool’s per-call cap is not a cumulative plan limit. Free continuation pages inside that approved plan need no second spending approval. A capped quote is a maximum, not a claim about final usage. Never treat discovery, a successful quote or a fixture as proof that a paid data read ran.

  1. Ask the tool for its quote (its dry run, quote_only, or gooseworks:data_price_provider for fal and ElevenLabs calls).
  2. Show each quote exactly as given. Several quotes are shown one by one, never added up by you.
  3. Ask for a yes to that quote. Submit only after it; a changed plan needs a new quote and a new yes.
  4. If an answer comes back as a card waiting for a press, follow the server's card rule and wait for the human.

B. Proxy data reads (no price check exists) — one yes

Covers gooseworks:data_call_provider / gooseworks:data_post_provider with ScrapeCreators, gooseworks:competitor_research with mentions, and capped imports (gooseworks:knowledge_sync, gooseworks:knowledge_import with a source, gooseworks:ads_library_scrape for Google). Endpoint paths, query keys and recency options: proxy-endpoints.md in this folder.

Paid reads deepen a free result; they are never the starting point. Offer them only after the playbook's free pass, in the same message as the draft answer (../marketing-guide/research-pattern.md (in the marketing-guide skill)), and ask once.

  1. Read the price history: research/credits-log/<YYYY-MM>.md for this month and last (the scope in the marketing-guide skill §2).
  2. Plan the top-up with a cap on every row (pages per query, items per page, comments per post, profiles per list) and say in plain words what it adds to the free result.
  3. Estimate and ask one yes to "up to N credits", labelled an estimate:
    • with history: N from the logged charges for these kinds of reads;
    • with no history: never invent a price. Say what the top-up adds and roughly how many reads it takes, that the first read shows the real price, and let the human name the ceiling in the same yes ("up to how many credits?"); with no number given, run only the probe call and report its price before anything else. The first call runs as the probe inside that same ceiling — never a separate yes. Caps that tools take in their own unit (a few import tools take a small dollar cap) are described in words — "a small capped import" — and the credits charged are reported afterwards; never quote the dollar figure.
  4. Run inside it. Run the probe call first and keep its results. If the real per-call charge means the plan cannot fit, trim the plan to fit the ceiling — never cross it; ask again only if the human wants more. Then the cheapest and most decisive rows first; stop a row when it saturates. Calls that depend on earlier results (comments on the posts a search finds) fit inside the same ceiling. A playbook may reserve part of the ceiling for a named purpose (research-market's crisis reserve for its listening).
  5. Log every charge as it comes back, in research/credits-log/<YYYY-MM>.md (same scope as step 1; read it, add the row, write the whole file back): date | playbook | tool/endpoint | query kind | items | credits "Query kind" describes the read ("brand name search, TikTok, past month"), never a private person's name or contact.
  6. Stop at the ceiling. If the next call would cross it, stop. A failed call is retried once only when its error says that is safe; a bad path or key is logged, never guessed again.
  7. Report: credits charged against the ceiling, in plain words. Endpoint detail stays in the log.

If the human declines or trims the top-up, the free result stands; name what the paid reads would have added as a gap ("not read: TikTok comments — top-up not approved").

C. Scheduled runs (automations)

  • Create every automation paused. Switch it on only on the human's yes in this conversation.
  • The yes names any standing per-run data ceiling ("up to N credits per run"); the run writes that ceiling into its prompt and logs every charge. Without one, a scheduled run uses free sources only and never spends on data.
  • The coworker's own run cost is not priced in advance: say so, and after the first run show the credits it used (gooseworks:automation_list) so the human can pause it.
  • A yes given in chat never carries over to a scheduled run unless it was given as a standing per-run ceiling.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<slug>

FreeSummary

The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.

  • No use case can be identified from the supplied material
  • Purpose is unspecified
  • Inputs and expected results are unspecified
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-angle-miner

FreeSummary

Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.

  • Finding evidence-backed angles for a product campaign
  • Developing static ad or video concepts from customer research
  • Writing headline and primary-text options for ads
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.

  • Finding campaigns and ads that waste budget
  • Comparing performance across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn
  • Planning specific budget shifts and follow-up tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.

  • Compare true qualified-lead costs across creatives
  • Find low-CPA ads that bring poor-quality leads
  • Check whether signups can be linked to downstream outcomes
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.

  • Prepare a Meta ad campaign when brand facts are missing
  • Clarify budget and timing before campaign planning
  • Record approved claims and audience restrictions
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-policy-check

FreeSummary

Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.

  • Checking ad copy and visuals before launch
  • Reviewing creator ads for required disclosures
  • Fixing a platform disapproval and recording the issue
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill