Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

voice-card

Build a practical voice card from real posts or a company blog, capturing measurable writing habits, examples, and recurring phrases. If there are too few posts, use a short interview; then check a draft against the card while keeping brand rules in control.

OriginalShow the original description

Builds or updates a voice card from a company blog ("extract our blog voice") or how an account or person actually writes, measured from about 8 or more of their real posts (length, casing, emoji, openings, pet phrases, opinions with their source). When there are too few posts, it runs a short interview instead. It ends with a test that checks a draft against the card. The brand's rules always beat the card. Use alone when you already have the account's posts or the person on hand; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. run-organic-social, write-outreach, email-lifecycle).

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,272 stars(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)
Works withTikTok

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Capturing a founder’s writing style from real posts
  • Documenting a company blog’s voice for future drafts
  • Checking whether a draft matches an account’s usual style
  • Creating a provisional voice card through an interview

Files included (6)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • references/blog-voice.md4.7 KB
  • skill.meta.json655 B
  • tests/examples/2026-10-22/blog-voice.md7.1 KB
  • tests/fixtures/company-blog.md6.8 KB
  • tests/test-by-hand.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

voice-card

The brand voice (kit voice plus the brand's rules: every dont and must in its learnings) says what the brand may say and how it sounds overall. A voice card says how one account or person actually writes: lowercase or not, how long, which emoji, how they open. Adjectives ("warm, playful") don't stop generic copy; a card measured from real posts does.

Choose the source

Used alone: first do the marketing-guide skill (../marketing-guide/SKILL.md) §1–2 (connection, brand and brain rules). Called from a writing job: reuse its setup. A company-blog or long-form voice ask follows references/blog-voice.md and returns; social posts and personal voice follow Build below. A blog guide is usable without releasing the full brand intake playbook.

Where it lives

  • One file per account or person: brand/voices/<handle>.md, brand coworker scope (coworker_agent_id from the gooseworks:brand_read list; no coworker → default workspace, path prefixed brands/<brand-slug>/).
  • Handle: lower-case, hyphens, no @: brand (the brand's own voice across its accounts), ig-<account>, tiktok-<account>, linkedin-<first-last>, founder-<first-last>, blog-<brand-slug> (company long-form writing). One card per account where mechanics differ; accounts that write the same way share brand.
  • Read before you write (gooseworks:file_read; file_write replaces the file). Save with the save-to-brain skill (../save-to-brain/SKILL.md) (versioned: supersede, title Voice card <handle> — <Brand> — <YYYY-MM-DD>, tags [voice-card, voice-<handle>]) so it is findable from any host. The tags name this atom, not the playbook that ran it: for save-to-brain's supersede rule, the creator is the first tag (voice-card), so any writer's newer card supersedes an older one.

Precedence (non-negotiable)

  1. The brand's rules win: every dont and must (never-say, banned words, terminology, not public), the claims contract (the claims-gate skill (../claims-gate/SKILL.md)), and the rules in the confirmed brand voice (what it never does, how it treats customers).
  2. A person's or account's card wins on style: mechanics, openings, lexicon, humour. The brand voice's style gives way to a founder's own card when writing as that founder.
  3. Real posts beat any description of the voice. Example lines in the kit voice are evidence of style only; a claim inside them is not proof.
  4. If the brand marker says voice: provisional, every card built on it is provisional too.

Read

gooseworks:file_read brand/voices/<handle>.md. Missing, or built more than 90 days ago, or older than the account's last 8 posts → build or update. A card marked status: provisional is usable, and drafts from it say so.

Build

  1. Sources, by weight:
    • the account's own real posts: TikTok/Instagram from gooseworks:brand_read sections: ["organic"] (own_posts); other platforms through the proxy (the marketing-data-access skill, ../marketing-data-access/SKILL.md) or, when not reachable, 10–20 posts the human pastes. For a founder, a few of their replies and comments too (the least polished, so the truest voice);
    • the kit voice, tone, and learnings (do / dont / must);
    • the buyers' words (research-audience's voice-of-customer bank, research/audience/voc-bank.md) for hooks only; it is not the brand's voice.
  2. Minimum corpus: about 8 real posts. Below it, run a 5-minute voice interview instead (or take a voice note via gooseworks:media_upload + gooseworks:media_analyze): 3 things you've written that sound like you; 3 words you'd never use; who you write for; a belief about the category others don't share; what makes you cringe in other brands' posts; emoji yes/no and which; lowercase or proper; one story you tell often; off-limits topics; who approves posts in your name. Save the card status: provisional.
  3. Measure, with numbers, not adjectives: words per sentence and per post (median, range); casing; line breaks; rates of em-dash, ellipsis, exclamation and question marks; emoji rate and the exact set; symbols used for words; fragment and typo tolerance; opening moves with 5–10 verbatim first lines; closings; pet phrases and nicknames; jargon and swearing level; how they name customers and rivals; humour; for people who take positions, a stance ledger (each opinion with its source post); never-says (moves absent from the corpus that AI reaches for); top 5 and bottom 5 posts against the account median with the likely why. Leave out captions that come back cut off.
  4. Write the card:
Voice card — <handle> · <Brand> · built <YYYY-MM-DD> from <n> posts (<sources>) · status: <confirmed | provisional>
Rules with numbers: …
Openings that are theirs: <5 verbatim>
Pet phrases: … · Never-says: …
Stance ledger: <opinion> — <source post>   (people only)
Humour: …
Brand rules that apply (from learnings): …
5 real posts, annotated (why each one sounds like them)
3 wrong → right rewrites (a generic draft vs the same idea in their voice)
What performed: top 5 / bottom 5 with the likely why
  1. Confirm. Show the card ("does this sound like you?"). A person's card needs that person's yes; until then it is provisional. Their corrections go into the card in their words.

Update

Append new posts, re-measure when at least 8 new ones exist, keep the stance ledger growing, bump the date, save a new version. Never drop a confirmed rule without the person's yes.

Match test (on every draft before it is shown)

  1. Every mechanic within the card's range; emoji set, casing and punctuation habits match exactly.
  2. Swap test: put a competitor's name in. If the draft still reads true, add the detail only this brand or person could say.
  3. Read aloud: would they say it?
  4. Line-up: mix the draft with three real posts; if someone holding only the card can pick out the draft, rewrite it.
  5. Then the claims-gate skill (../claims-gate/SKILL.md) on the draft.

Named people

Never invent first-person experience, a habit, product use, a number or an opinion for a founder, ambassador, employee or customer. An opinion must trace to the stance ledger or to their own words in this conversation. Leave a marked gap ([NAME: the time a customer caught a bug before you did]) for material they haven't given; a gap with no material behind it is cut.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<slug>

FreeSummary

The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.

  • No use case can be identified from the supplied material
  • Purpose is unspecified
  • Inputs and expected results are unspecified
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-angle-miner

FreeSummary

Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.

  • Finding evidence-backed angles for a product campaign
  • Developing static ad or video concepts from customer research
  • Writing headline and primary-text options for ads
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.

  • Finding campaigns and ads that waste budget
  • Comparing performance across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn
  • Planning specific budget shifts and follow-up tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.

  • Compare true qualified-lead costs across creatives
  • Find low-CPA ads that bring poor-quality leads
  • Check whether signups can be linked to downstream outcomes
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.

  • Prepare a Meta ad campaign when brand facts are missing
  • Clarify budget and timing before campaign planning
  • Record approved claims and audience restrictions
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-policy-check

FreeSummary

Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.

  • Checking ad copy and visuals before launch
  • Reviewing creator ads for required disclosures
  • Fixing a platform disapproval and recording the issue
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill