Assesses named creator candidates using public profiles and posts. It reports dated performance figures, audience fit with confidence, brand safety signals, competitor ties, and any regulated-category concerns, with links and reasons for each verdict.
Vets creators you have already named from their public pages. Covers the median views of their last 12 to 20 posts (sponsored and organic apart), a read of their comments, how often they post, audience fit with how sure it is, about 12 months of brand-safety checks, rival partnerships and rules for regulated categories. Gives a verdict with dated numbers for each one. Use alone when you already have the creator handles and the brand's goal; otherwise run work-with-creators.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Reads: finalists; the persona and goal; signed-off claims and never-says (to spot conflicting past claims); competitor list; ../work-with-creators/references/vetting.md; ../work-with-creators/references/data-sources.md.
Does, per finalist — at the depth set in discovery (full, light, UGC rubric, B2B branch; see section 0 of the reference). Free first: everything below is done from the public profile and post pages in the host browser (reference §15 says what each platform shows logged-out), labelled "public-page read <date>". What a page hides (views on some platforms, comments behind a login, audience countries, transcripts) is listed for the paid top-up, never guessed.
Writes: a verdict per finalist with all numbers, vetted_on date and post links; near-misses with reasons.
Rules: no number, no verdict. Label all authenticity findings "signals, not verified". Never infer ethnicity, age, gender, skin tone or health from images or names. No business-contact lookups here — they wait until the human approves the names.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.
Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.
Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.
Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.
Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.
Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.