Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

write-outreach-draft-sequence

Drafts a cold outreach sequence for one customer segment using prepared buyer pain points, approved proof, contact rows, and a planned ask. It creates tailored email and LinkedIn messages, follow-ups, first lines, and reply guidance while following channel and regional rules.

OriginalShow the original description

Step of the write-outreach playbook: the brief a helper follows to write one segment's email and LinkedIn sequence, first lines and replies from rows and an angle prepared earlier. Run write-outreach instead; not for direct use.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1,272 stars(GitHub 1,272 + cccskills 0)
Works withLinkedIn

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Writing a cold email sequence for one prepared segment
  • Creating LinkedIn connection notes and follow-up messages
  • Turning verified contact signals into personalized openers

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.6 KB
  • skill.meta.json241 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

draft-sequence

You are writing cold outreach for one segment of one brand. This brief is complete: don't load any skill, don't read playbook files, don't start other agents, make no GooseWorks calls. At most 3 web reads, only to re-check that a row's signal link still says what the row claims. Return in the shape at the end; no preamble.

Inputs (in the prompt): the brand, what it sells and its price; the sender (name, role); the segment and its angle — pain in the buyers' words (with the quote and link — or, with no quote bank, in our words labelled "not yet from buyers"), proof (a signed-off claim verbatim, or "proof needed: <what>"), the ask; the sequence shape (touches, channels, days); the rows (name, title, company, signal + URL + date, hook + URL, region flag, email status); the brand's [outreach …] rules and voice notes; today's date.

Rules

  • Touch 1: first line = the row's signal or hook and why it matters to the pain; then one or two lines on the pain and what we do (plain product fact, or the signed-off proof verbatim); one ask; sign-off with the sender's first name. 50–90 words. Subject under 50 characters, lower-case, plain.
  • Follow-ups: each adds something new (a second pain, a short resource, signed-off proof, or a general practice framed as such — never an invented peer story) — never "bumping", "checking in", "circling back". 30–50 words, then 20–30 for the last, which leaves the door open without guilt. Same thread.
  • At most 6 touches in all per person (e.g. 4 emails, the connection request, one LinkedIn message).
  • LinkedIn: connection note ≤200 characters with no pitch, no ask, no link (free accounts get only a few notes a month — at volume, the invite goes without a note and the line moves to message 1); messages after accept are short, value first, one question; never the email's text.
  • First line per row: built only on that row's facts. Nothing invented — no compliments, mutual connections, numbers, customers or results. No hook → write "no personal hook" and use the segment opener.
  • Never: hype words (revolutionary, game-changing, cutting-edge, best-in-class), jargon (synergy, leverage, touch base), "hope this finds you well", fake "Re:", lying about how you found them, school, family, health, politics, location, "#OpenToWork", the funding amount as the opener, the predecessor of a new leader.
  • Proof: only the signed-off line you were given, verbatim. Anything else that sounds like a result → cut it and list it under "proof needed".
  • Region rules: UK-soletrader → a short letter instead of email and no DM; CASL / AU-NZ with a non-published address → no email, LinkedIn only; every email ends with the opt-out line you were given; EU-UK, UK-ltd and unknown-country rows' first email carries the source-and-object line.
  • Count words and characters; rewrite to fit, never cut a sentence off.

Return this shape

## <Segment>
Angle: pain "<their words>" (<link>) · proof: <verbatim or "proof needed: …"> · ask: <…>
Sequence: | day | channel | touch | subject | text | words/chars |
First lines: | row | first line | rests on (signal/hook URL, date) |
Letters (UK sole traders, if any): …
Replies: | category | answer |
Proof needed: …
Re-checked links: <n> held, <n> changed (which)

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

<slug>

FreeSummary

The supplied material contains only placeholder text for the skill’s purpose, inputs, steps, and completion criteria. It does not provide enough information to describe a task or result reliably.

  • No use case can be identified from the supplied material
  • Purpose is unspecified
  • Inputs and expected results are unspecified
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-angle-miner

FreeSummary

Research supported advertising angles using buyer context, current product facts, customer language, and observed ads. Turn the evidence into static ad, video, or copy ideas, matching video concepts to available recipes. Scores rank ideas for testing; they do not predict results.

  • Finding evidence-backed angles for a product campaign
  • Developing static ad or video concepts from customer research
  • Writing headline and primary-text options for ads
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Analyze campaign data from Google, Meta, and LinkedIn to find strong and wasteful spend. The skill checks funnel performance and test results, then recommends which campaigns to pause, scale, or test and how to shift budget across channels.

  • Finding campaigns and ads that waste budget
  • Comparing performance across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn
  • Planning specific budget shifts and follow-up tests
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Compare ad spend and signups with downstream outcomes to calculate the cost of each qualified lead. The skill checks tracking coverage, accounts for how long leads need to mature, and groups creatives into actionable categories with confidence notes.

  • Compare true qualified-lead costs across creatives
  • Find low-CPA ads that bring poor-quality leads
  • Check whether signups can be linked to downstream outcomes
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Prepare the intake for a Meta ad campaign by reviewing available brand information first, stating reasonable assumptions, and asking only questions whose answers could affect budget, claims, or legal exposure. It records stable brand facts, a campaign brief, and what was asked versus assumed.

  • Prepare a Meta ad campaign when brand facts are missing
  • Clarify budget and timing before campaign planning
  • Record approved claims and audience restrictions
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

ad-policy-check

FreeSummary

Review ad copy, image text, visuals, and people against platform and brand category rules. It suggests honest fixes and needed disclosures, then flags issues requiring human or legal review, with a separate result for each ad and platform.

  • Checking ad copy and visuals before launch
  • Reviewing creator ads for required disclosures
  • Fixing a platform disapproval and recording the issue
gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 27, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill