Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

deal-risk-scoring

Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150 stars(GitHub 150 + cccskills 0)
Works withLinkedIn

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md9.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Deal Risk Scoring

Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.

When to Use This Skill

  • Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
  • Before QBRs to identify problem deals
  • When deals stall or push close dates
  • Prioritizing manager coaching time
  • Allocating SE/executive resources

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:

  • Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
  • Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
  • Competitive signals
  • Timeline alignment
  • Champion strength

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Scores deals on risk factorsWhich deals to save vs. let go
Identifies missing elementsResource allocation priorities
Suggests intervention actionsExecutive sponsor assignments
Tracks velocity trendsFinal stage/probability updates
Flags competitive threatsWin strategy adjustments

What This Skill Does

  1. Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
  2. Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
  3. Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
  4. Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
  5. Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time

How to Use

Assess the risk for this deal:

Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X

Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]

Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]

Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]

Instructions

Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Meeting in last 7 days+10
Email response in last 3 days+5
Multiple contacts engaged+5
Prospect initiating contact+5
No activity 14+ days-15

Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Economic Buyer identified+10
Champion confirmed+10
Technical evaluator engaged+5
Only 1 contact-10
No C-level access-5

Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Clear next step scheduled+10
Mutual action plan agreed+10
Decision timeline confirmed+5
Close date pushed 2+ times-15
No defined process-10

Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
No competition+15
Differentiation clear+10
Incumbent advantage-10
Price pressure-5
Unknown competitive status-5

Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score

ScoreHealthAction
75-100🟢 GreenMonitor, standard process
50-74🟡 YellowIntervention needed
25-49🟠 OrangeEscalate, major action
0-24🔴 RedRescue or disqualify

Examples

Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal

Input:

Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28

Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)

Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts

Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global

### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |

### Critical Risks

1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor

2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
   - If John is out, deal is dead

3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
   - John may not have authority to close

### Recommended Actions

**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval

**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot

### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized

### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.

Example 2: Healthy Deal Review

Input:

Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7

Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10

Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo

Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc

### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |

### Strengths

1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally

### Minor Risks

1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines

2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call

### Recommended Actions

**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria

### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Objective risk scoring from available data
  • Identifying gaps in deal coverage
  • Prioritizing which deals need attention
  • Suggesting specific interventions

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Know information not provided (internal politics)
  • Predict competitor moves
  • Replace relationship judgment
  • Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data

When to Escalate to Human

  • Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
  • Deals involving partnerships or M&A
  • Unusual contract structures
  • Competitive intelligence gathering

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
  • "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
  • "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
  • "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks
  2. Take action → Update activity log
  3. Re-score → Track improvement
  4. Weekly review → Trend analysis

Checklists & Templates

Deal Health Checklist

  • Champion identified and engaged this week
  • Economic Buyer met at least once
  • Next step scheduled within 7 days
  • Competition status known
  • Close date validated by prospect

Risk Score Template

## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]

### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]

### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |

### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.

References

  • Gong Deal Intelligence Research
  • Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
  • MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
  • Force Management Command of the Message

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Aggregate deal health into forecast
  • lead-qualification-meddic - Deep qualification framework
  • account-health - Post-sale relationship scoring

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
  • Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills150Updated Oct 1, 2026

See all skills by guia-matthieu

Report a problem with this skill