aarrr-metrics
FreeMeasure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Assess deal health and identify at-risk opportunities using engagement signals, stakeholder mapping, and velocity analysis
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.
Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Scores deals on risk factors | Which deals to save vs. let go |
| Identifies missing elements | Resource allocation priorities |
| Suggests intervention actions | Executive sponsor assignments |
| Tracks velocity trends | Final stage/probability updates |
| Flags competitive threats | Win strategy adjustments |
Assess the risk for this deal:
Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X
Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]
Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]
Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Meeting in last 7 days | +10 |
| Email response in last 3 days | +5 |
| Multiple contacts engaged | +5 |
| Prospect initiating contact | +5 |
| No activity 14+ days | -15 |
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Economic Buyer identified | +10 |
| Champion confirmed | +10 |
| Technical evaluator engaged | +5 |
| Only 1 contact | -10 |
| No C-level access | -5 |
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Clear next step scheduled | +10 |
| Mutual action plan agreed | +10 |
| Decision timeline confirmed | +5 |
| Close date pushed 2+ times | -15 |
| No defined process | -10 |
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| No competition | +15 |
| Differentiation clear | +10 |
| Incumbent advantage | -10 |
| Price pressure | -5 |
| Unknown competitive status | -5 |
| Score | Health | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 75-100 | 🟢 Green | Monitor, standard process |
| 50-74 | 🟡 Yellow | Intervention needed |
| 25-49 | 🟠 Orange | Escalate, major action |
| 0-24 | 🔴 Red | Rescue or disqualify |
Input:
Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28
Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)
Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts
Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global
### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK
### Score Breakdown
| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |
### Critical Risks
1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
- Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor
2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
- If John is out, deal is dead
3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
- John may not have authority to close
### Recommended Actions
**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval
**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot
### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized
### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.
Input:
Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7
Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10
Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo
Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally
Output:
## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc
### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY
### Score Breakdown
| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |
### Strengths
1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally
### Minor Risks
1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
- Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines
2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
- Mitigation: Ask directly in next call
### Recommended Actions
**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria
### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.
## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]
### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]
### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |
### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.
pipeline-forecasting - Aggregate deal health into forecastlead-qualification-meddic - Deep qualification frameworkaccount-health - Post-sale relationship scoringNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Measure and optimize growth using the AARRR (Pirate Metrics) framework with stage-specific KPIs and funnel analysis
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Calculate A/B test statistical significance. Use when: determining if test results are significant; calculating required sample size; estimating test duration; analyzing conversion experiments; making data-driven decisions
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Assess customer account health using product usage, support sentiment, payment status, and relationship signals
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyze paid advertising performance across channels and recommend budget reallocation to maximize ROAS and minimize CAC. Use when: planning quarterly ad budget allocation, diagnosing underperforming ad channels, deciding whether to scale spend on a channel, calculating marginal ROI across Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or TikTok, rebalancing media mix after performance shifts, or setting up a test-and-scale framework for new channels.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when testing skills, commands, or agents for quality. Use after creating new skills, before deploying agents, or when debugging inconsistent agent behavior. Triggers on "evaluate", "test quality", "is this skill working", or QA of AI workflows.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when analyzing server logs to understand how AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) interact with your site. Use when optimizing content placement for LLM retrieval, diagnosing why AI search isn't citing your content, or auditing crawl patterns to find optimization gaps.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.