Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

dygo-test-strategy

Select, write, or review proportionate tests and verification for dygo Go packages, PostgreSQL behavior, metadata, CLI contracts, Studio, integrations, and releases. Use when test scope or confidence strategy is the main decision.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Works withPostgreSQL
See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

dygo Test Strategy

Test the meaningful invariant at the lowest useful boundary.

Choose The Boundary

  • Use a focused Go package test for pure logic and package contracts.
  • Use PostgreSQL-backed tests for transactions, schema state, constraints, concurrency, and Record behavior.
  • Use CLI tests for arguments, streams, plans, prompts, redaction, and exit behavior.
  • Use metadata fixtures for parsing, validation, identity, and deterministic diagnostics.
  • Use Studio unit tests for stores, queries, renderers, and component behavior.
  • Use browser checks for interaction, navigation, accessibility, and layout acceptance.
  • Use release smoke tests for archives, installers, bundled assets, and reported versions.

Rules

  • Test business or framework behavior, not exact implementation wording.
  • Inspect existing coverage before adding tests. Add a case for a meaningful behavior or failure mode that is not adequately covered, not merely for a new function or file.
  • Extend an existing case when it covers the same contract clearly. Test at multiple layers only when each protects a distinct failure mode.
  • Prefer observable results over source patterns or incidental markup. Keep source and file assertions when generated output, ownership markers, wire formats, or bundled assets are the contract.
  • Before removing a test, map its unique assertions and input cases to retained coverage, a stronger replacement, or a confirmed obsolete contract. Resolve fixture helpers before calling cases duplicates.
  • Consolidate repeated setup with named cases when this stays clear. Preserve distinct failure modes and useful diagnostics; fewer lines do not necessarily mean fewer executions.
  • Make assertions prove the named behavior: presence does not prove order, a preset mock decision does not prove authorization, and any error does not prove the intended rejection. Redaction checks must introduce sensitive input.
  • Add a regression test when a defect can recur and the boundary is stable.
  • Do not add tests that mirror a reversible, low-impact edit when existing validation proves the result.
  • Do not chase an arbitrary coverage percentage.
  • Keep database tests deterministic and isolate their state. SQL-construction tests do not replace PostgreSQL behavior checks; report skipped integration tests and their execution requirements.
  • Include failure and rollback cases for high-risk writes.
  • Include authorization cases for data-bearing APIs.
  • Use race or concurrency checks when ownership, workers, claims, or goroutines changed.
  • Run the narrowest relevant checks during development. Run broader checks before a major commit or release.
  • After relevant and required checks pass, repeat or broaden them only for new changes, failures, or unresolved concerns.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design, implement, or review dygo roles, Entity access metadata, Permissions, and permission-aware Business App behavior. Use when access to Records or business actions is central to the task.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

Design, implement, or review dygo HTTP APIs and public App SDK contracts. Use for Record APIs, metadata and boot endpoints, query behavior, response envelopes, compatibility, and public Go interfaces.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

Diagnose a dygo Business App that does not validate, boot, route, render, authorize, migrate, or execute background work correctly. Use for evidence-first investigation rather than feature implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

Build or extend a dygo Business App using the supported project layout, generators, metadata, SDK, and validation workflow. Use for general app work that is not primarily Entity modeling, access, hooks, Jobs, fixtures, or patches.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

Review a dygo Business App for framework conventions, model quality, access control, SDK boundaries, observability, and safe lifecycle behavior. Use for App audits and pre-merge reviews, not ordinary implementation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

Design, implement, or review the dygo framework CLI in Go with Cobra. Use for commands, flags, help, prompts, plans, output contracts, completion, and project-aware CLI behavior. Do not use for operating a deployed business through the reserved dygo-cli operator skill.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hapyco/dygo16Updated Oct 18, 2026

See all skills by hapyco

Report a problem with this skill