code-reviewer
FreeReview code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Open a pull request with proper PR template, test coverage, and review workflow. Guides agents through creating a PR that follows repo conventions, ensures existing behaviors aren't broken, covers new behaviors with tests, and handles review via bot when local testing isn't possible. TRIGGER when user asks to "open a PR", "create a PR", "make a PR", "submit a PR", "open pull request", "push and create PR", or any variation of opening/submitting a pull request.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Before opening the PR:
git push -u origin <branch>)This is critical. Before opening the PR, verify:
If you cannot run the full test suite locally, note which tests you ran and which you couldn't in the test plan.
Read the canonical PR template at .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md and use it verbatim as your PR body:
cat .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md### Why / What / How### Changes 🏗️### Checklist 📋<!-- ... -->) with actual content; do not leave them in- [ ] until each step is actually completedPR title must use conventional commit format (e.g., feat(backend): add new block, fix(frontend): resolve routing bug, dx(skills): update PR workflow). See CLAUDE.md for the full list of scopes.
Use gh pr create with the base branch (defaults to dev if no [base-branch] was provided). Use --body-file to avoid shell interpretation of backticks and special characters:
BASE_BRANCH="${BASE_BRANCH:-dev}"
PR_BODY=$(mktemp)
cat > "$PR_BODY" << 'PREOF'
<filled-in template from .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md>
PREOF
gh pr create --base "$BASE_BRANCH" --title "<type>(scope): short description" --body-file "$PR_BODY"
rm "$PR_BODY"
/pr-test to do E2E manual testing of the PR using docker compose, agent-browser, and API calls. This is the most thorough way to validate your changes before review./pr-review to self-review the PR for correctness, security, code quality, and testing gaps before requesting human review.This is common for agents running in worktrees without a full stack. In this case:
/pr-review locally to catch obvious issues before pushing/review on the PR after creating it to trigger the review botgh api repos/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/pulls/{N}/reviews --paginate and the GraphQL inline threads query. The bot typically responds within 30 minutes, but polling lets the agent react as soon as it arrives./pr-address which has a full polling loop with CI + comment tracking# After creating the PR:
PR_NUMBER=$(gh pr view --json number -q .number)
gh pr comment "$PR_NUMBER" --body "/review"
# Then use /pr-address to poll for and address the review when it arrives
Once the review bot or human reviewers leave comments:
/pr-address to address review comments. It will loop until CI is green and all comments are resolved.| Skill | When to use |
|---|---|
/pr-test | E2E testing with docker compose, agent-browser, API calls — use when you have a running workspace |
/pr-review | Review for correctness, security, code quality — use before requesting human review |
/pr-address | Address reviewer comments and loop until CI green — use after reviews come in |
After the PR is created and review is triggered:
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Review code for quality, bugs, and improvements. Use when user wants code review or quality assessment.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Analyze datasets and extract insights. Use when user needs to understand data patterns, statistics, or trends.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Incrementally update Mintlify documentation (.mdx) from Python source changes only. Use when: (1) Python files referenced in doc_code_map frontmatter have changed, (2) a PR touches Python modules documented in docs/mintlify/key_modules/ or docs/mintlify/mcp/, (3) the user asks to sync docs after Python code changes. Prefer minimal diffs and leave correct content untouched.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Meta-agent supervisor that manages a fleet of Claude Code agents running in tmux windows. Auto-discovers spare worktrees, spawns agents, monitors state, kicks idle agents, approves safe confirmations, and recycles worktrees when done. TRIGGER when user asks to supervise agents, run parallel tasks, manage worktrees, check agent status, or orchestrate parallel work.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Address PR review comments and loop until CI green and all comments resolved. TRIGGER when user asks to address comments, fix PR feedback, respond to reviewers, or babysit/monitor a PR.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Alternate /pr-review and /pr-address on a PR until the PR is truly mergeable — no new review findings, zero unresolved inline threads, zero unaddressed top-level reviews or issue comments, all CI checks green, and two consecutive quiet polls after CI settles. Use when the user wants a PR polished to merge-ready without setting a fixed number of rounds.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.