Organize competing tasks by impact, difficulty, and dependencies, then choose one main priority. State what completion looks like, keep unrelated requests queued, and finish and verify the chosen task before reassessing the remaining work.
集中兵力：多件事同时争抢时间、注意力或预算时，列出全部待办，选定唯一主攻目标并公开锁定，彻底解决、验证后再转向下一个。当待办过多、推进分散、"每件都做了一点但都没做完"、需要决定先做什么时触发；只有一个任务、任务彼此独立可并行、用户明确要求同时推进时不触发。
English: Concentrate forces. When several tasks compete for time, attention, or budget, enumerate them, lock onto a single main target, finish and verify it completely, then move on. Trigger when priorities sprawl, effort is scattered, or you must decide what to do first; skip when there is one task, tasks are independent and parallel, or the user explicitly wants them advanced together.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
"伤其十指不如断其一指。" —— 《中国革命战争的战略问题》
用：
不用：
contradiction-analysis。investigation-first。🎯 当前主攻目标：……
原因：……
完成信号：……（可观测）
暂缓（主攻完成后处理）：
- ……：为何暂缓
- ……
criticism-self-criticism 短复盘 → 回到第 1 步选下一个contradiction-analysis原著依据：original-texts.md
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Guide an agent to ground judgments in evidence, separate facts from inferences and unknowns, verify results, and diagnose failures. It also selects a suitable methodology skill when investigation, prioritization, validation, or another structured approach would help.
Break down a complex problem into opposing needs, identify the central conflict and its dominant side, then choose a response. The analysis also highlights changing priorities and tensions that need monitoring as work progresses.
Review completed work and its process against the original goals and acceptance criteria. Identify specific problems, root causes, and actionable fixes, while checking external criticism against evidence and correcting valid issues.
Investigate firsthand sources before making a judgment or recommendation. Separate verified facts, reasoned inferences, and unknowns, document their sources, and produce a conclusion that explains the current situation, constraints, and remaining uncertainty.
Combine feedback from users, code, logs, and runtime results into a reasoned plan. Separate agreement from conflicting evidence, explain the judgment, and validate it with the people or systems that supplied the original information.
Plan decisions where improving one goal can harm another. Identify competing priorities, set the current emphasis and minimum acceptable levels, check effects across the whole plan, and define signals that call for rebalancing.