arXiv

Find the paper, judge whether it matters, read it, cite it. Two free APIs, no key and no account: arXiv for the papers themselves, Semantic Scholar for what arXiv does not carry, which is chiefly who cited whom.

Use this when the user names a paper, an author, a research area, or asks what the state of the art is on something academic. For a general web question, use web-research. For a multi-pass cited report, use deep_research_synthesis, which calls this one.

Prerequisites

curl and Python 3, both already present. Nothing to install: the bundled script uses the standard library only.

python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py "attention is all you need" --max 3

Success prints titles, authors, dates and arXiv ids. A traceback means the path is wrong; locate the script with file_search rather than guessing another prefix.

Procedure

1. Find candidates. The script parses arXiv's Atom XML and prints something readable.

   python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py "GRPO reinforcement learning"
   python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py "world models" --max 10 --sort date
   python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py --author "Yann LeCun" --max 5
   python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py --category cs.AI --sort date
   python skills/arxiv/scripts/search_arxiv.py --id 2402.03300,1706.03762
   

2. Judge before reading. arXiv is not peer reviewed and holds no citation data. A preprint with no citations after two years is rarely the state of the art, whatever its abstract claims. Ask Semantic Scholar:

   curl -s "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/arXiv:2402.03300?fields=title,year,citationCount,influentialCitationCount,isOpenAccess" | python -m json.tool
   

   influentialCitationCount is the number worth reading: it counts papers that built on this one, rather than papers that listed it in related work.

3. Read it. web_fetch takes ONE url, as a string, and extracts a PDF served over HTTP by itself.

   web_fetch(url="https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300")
   web_fetch(url="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.03300")
   

   The abstract states what the authors hoped for. For any claim you are going to repeat, read the results and the limitations sections in the PDF itself.

   If the fetch is refused, download and read from disk: curl -sL "https://arxiv.org/pdf/<id>" -o "C:\tmp\paper.pdf", then read_extract with path set to that absolute path. read_extract reads LOCAL files only.

4. Follow the citations, in whichever direction the question needs.

   # who built on it
   curl -s "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/arXiv:ID/citations?fields=title,year,citationCount&limit=10" | python -m json.tool
   # what it rests on
   curl -s "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/arXiv:ID/references?fields=title,year,citationCount&limit=20" | python -m json.tool
   

5. Record what matters with finding, passing fact and source, as you read it. A paper you read three calls ago can be gone from context by the time you write.

Query syntax

The API matches on prefixed fields, and + stands for the space, so quote the whole URL.

Prefix	Searches
all:	everywhere
ti:	title
au:	author
abs:	abstract
cat:	category
co:	the comment field, where "accepted at NeurIPS" lives

Combine with +AND+, +OR+, +ANDNOT+. An exact phrase goes in quotes: ti:"chain+of+thought".

Sorting takes sortBy as relevance, lastUpdatedDate or submittedDate, and sortOrder as ascending or descending. start pages through the results.

curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?search_query=cat:cs.AI&sortBy=submittedDate&sortOrder=descending&max_results=10"

Common categories: cs.AI, cs.CL for language, cs.CV for vision, cs.LG for machine learning, cs.CR for security, stat.ML, math.OC. Full taxonomy at https://arxiv.org/category_taxonomy.

BibTeX

curl -s "https://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=1706.03762" | python -c "
import sys, xml.etree.ElementTree as ET
ns = {'a': 'http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom', 'arxiv': 'http://arxiv.org/schemas/atom'}
entry = ET.parse(sys.stdin).getroot().find('a:entry', ns)
if entry is None: sys.exit('paper not found')
title = ' '.join(entry.find('a:title', ns).text.split())
authors = ' and '.join(a.find('a:name', ns).text for a in entry.findall('a:author', ns))
year = entry.find('a:published', ns).text[:4]
ident = entry.find('a:id', ns).text.strip().split('/abs/')[-1]
cat = entry.find('arxiv:primary_category', ns)
surname = entry.find('a:author', ns).find('a:name', ns).text.split()[-1]
print(f'@article{{{surname}{year}_{ident.replace(\".\", \"\")},')
print(f'  title         = {{{title}}},')
print(f'  author        = {{{authors}}},')
print(f'  year          = {{{year}}},')
print(f'  eprint        = {{{ident}}},')
print(f'  archivePrefix = {{arXiv}},')
print(f'  primaryClass  = {{{cat.get(\"term\") if cat is not None else \"cs.LG\"}}},')
print(f'  url           = {{https://arxiv.org/abs/{ident}}}')
print('}')
"

The <id> field carries the version, so the entry pins the version you actually read.

Traps

• arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 is the LATEST version, and versions are not editorial touch-ups: results change and claims get withdrawn between them. Cite with the suffix you read, 1706.03762v7, or the citation silently drifts under you.
• Check for a withdrawal. The <summary> of a withdrawn paper says so in words. Read it before treating a result as real.
• arXiv carries no citation data at all. Any citation count in an answer came from Semantic Scholar or was invented. There is no third possibility.
• A high citation count is not agreement. Papers are cited in order to be refuted. When the number carries weight, look at what the citing papers actually say.
• Two id formats coexist. Old is hep-th/0601001, new is 2402.03300. Both resolve. Do not "correct" an old one.
• The rate limits are real. arXiv wants roughly one request every three seconds, Semantic Scholar one per second without a key. Do not fan these out in parallel: the block lands on the machine and outlives the session.

Failure modes

The search returns nothing for a paper you know exists. The query used your words rather than the paper's. Try ti: with three distinctive words from the real title, or --id if you have the identifier.

Semantic Scholar returns 404 for a valid arXiv id. It has not indexed that preprint yet, which is normal in the first days. Report the paper without citation data, rather than reporting no paper.

Semantic Scholar returns 429. Rate limited. Wait, then retry once, spacing calls to one per second.

The PDF fetch returns something unreadable. The paper is a scan, or extraction failed. Try arxiv.org/html/<id>, which exists for recent submissions, then fall back to downloading it and using the ocr-and-documents skill.

The script prints a traceback about XML. arXiv returned an HTML error page instead of Atom, which is what rate limiting looks like from here. Wait thirty seconds and retry.