Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

adobe-enterprise-rbac

Review access across Adobe organizations, projects, product profiles, and technical accounts. The skill maps effective permissions, identifies stale or overly broad access, and prepares an approved, reviewable plan for provisioning, revocation, and periodic recertification.

OriginalShow the original description

Govern Adobe Developer Console roles, product profiles, technical accounts, User Management API automation, and periodic access review. Use when the task requires adobe enterprise access governance. Trigger with "Adobe RBAC", "Adobe product profiles", or "Adobe user provisioning".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Review Adobe product profile assignments
  • Plan joiner, mover, and leaver access changes
  • Find stale users and broad permissions
  • Prepare evidence for an access recertification

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Adobe Enterprise Access Governance

Overview

Govern Adobe Developer Console roles, product profiles, technical accounts, User Management API automation, and periodic access review. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

Developer Console project access, API scopes, product entitlement, product-profile assignment, and resource ownership are distinct. User Management API manages enterprise users/groups/entitlements under its own authorization; it is not a generic fix for application API access. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Use named admin/automation identities with least privilege, environment binding, approver separation, rotation, and review dates. Technical-account access is constrained by assigned product profiles.

Instructions

  1. Inventory organizations, directories, admins, developers, projects, credentials, users/groups, products, profiles, and automation.
  2. Build a role-to-operation matrix and calculate effective access across Console roles, scopes, profiles, and resources.
  3. Identify orphaned credentials, broad profiles, stale users, shared admins, and cross-environment grants.
  4. Design joiner/mover/leaver and service-account changes with approval, idempotency, reconciliation, and rollback.
  5. Canary UMAPI changes on a synthetic group where authorized and compare intended versus effective access.
  6. Schedule recertification, exception expiry, secret rotation, audit export, and emergency revocation.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Organization, product, identity, and security owners approve grants and revocations. Bulk membership/profile changes and credential deletion require explicit execution approval.

Error Handling

  • Do not equate an OAuth scope with product entitlement.
  • Do not use UMAPI against an unverified organization.
  • Quarantine drift rather than auto-removing critical access without an approved rollback.

Output

Return organization/access inventory, effective-access matrix, findings, approved change plan, reconciliation, exceptions, and recertification schedule. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Prove a technical account is limited by its product profile.
  • Remove a synthetic group assignment and verify intended loss of access.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • orphaned account
  • overbroad profile
  • wrong organization
  • stale admin
  • bulk partial failure
  • rollback

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill