Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

adobe-known-pitfalls

Review Adobe integration code and configuration for retired APIs, authentication mistakes, exposed secrets, and fragile workflows. Produce findings with file references, supporting sources, proposed corrections, tests, and unresolved risks before making live changes.

OriginalShow the original description

Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. Use when the task requires adobe integration pitfall review. Trigger with "Adobe pitfalls", "review Adobe integration", or "find obsolete Adobe code".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Find retired Adobe API endpoints
  • Review authentication and secret handling
  • Check asynchronous jobs and signed URLs
  • Prepare evidence and fixes before release

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Adobe Integration Pitfall Review

Overview

Detect current high-risk Adobe integration traps before they become production incidents. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

High-risk traps include Service Account JWT, confusing S2S with user auth, missing entitlements/profiles, secrets in clients, retired Photoshop v1 and Lightroom Firefly Services, reconstructed async URLs, leaked signed URLs, fixed limits, unverified events, and wrong App Builder workspace. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Review effective authority and secret flow before code style. A valid token, installed SDK, or successful deploy does not prove product entitlement or correct data ownership.

Instructions

  1. Read manifests, locks, config, adapters, routes, workflows, logs, dashboards, tests, and runbooks.
  2. Glob and Grep for JWT, /sensei/cutout, Lightroom Firefly Services, client-side secrets, fixed quotas, and hardcoded job routes.
  3. Trace auth ownership, product profiles, versions, signed URLs, async states, retries, events, workspaces, and cleanup.
  4. Classify each finding as obsolete, unsafe, brittle, undocumented, environment-specific, or stale evidence.
  5. Propose the smallest compatible correction with tests, canary, rollback, and named owner.
  6. Edit only approved repository artifacts, rerun gates, and record unresolved external dependencies.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Read-only review needs no mutation authority. Credential/profile changes, production calls, deploys, replays, registration changes, and deletion require separate explicit approval.

Error Handling

  • Do not replace one remembered constant with another.
  • Do not infer a product from a similarly named Adobe API.
  • Do not auto-fix secrets without coordinated rotation and revocation.

Output

Return findings with file/line evidence, current sources, severity, correction, test, owner, and unresolved risks. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Find a retired endpoint in code and documentation.
  • Find a status URL reconstructed from jobId instead of response evidence.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • JWT
  • Photoshop v1
  • Lightroom EOL
  • client secret
  • fixed limit
  • forged event

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill