Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

adobe-migration-deep-dive

Plan a migration of multiple workflows into or across Adobe services. Map capabilities and dependencies, identify gaps, compare outputs during controlled dual runs, track costs, and prepare staged cutover and rollback decisions with supporting evidence.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyze and execute a multi-workload migration into or across Adobe services with contract evidence, dependency waves, dual-run reconciliation, cost controls, and rollback. Use when the task requires adobe platform migration program. Trigger with "Adobe migration plan", "move workflow to Adobe", or "Adobe platform consolidation".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Planning a multi-workflow migration to Adobe
  • Mapping source capabilities to Adobe services
  • Checking output parity during a migration wave
  • Preparing cost controls and rollback decisions

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Adobe Platform Migration Program

Overview

Analyze and execute a multi-workload migration into or across Adobe services with contract evidence, dependency waves, dual-run reconciliation, cost controls, and rollback. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

A migration is a set of product-specific contracts, not an endpoint translation. Auth ownership, entitlement, async behavior, input/output fidelity, storage custody, content rules, limits, events, and operational tooling must each map from source to target. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Choose S2S or user auth per data owner, not migration convenience. Preserve source/target identity and access evidence and never copy secrets or production content into test fixtures.

Instructions

  1. Inventory source workflows, volumes, identities, data classes, formats, SLAs, costs, dependencies, and retirement constraints.
  2. Map each capability to current Adobe service/version or classify it as gap, redesign, or retire; exclude EOL products.
  3. Define adapters, canonical data contracts, idempotency, provenance, reconciliation, storage, and rollback boundaries.
  4. Build synthetic and sampled approved parity tests for outputs, metadata, ordering, policy, latency, and cost.
  5. Migrate in dependency waves with shadow/dual-run only where duplicate actions and spend are controlled.
  6. Reconcile every wave, cut over from explicit thresholds, archive receipts, and remove approved obsolete paths and credentials.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Program, identity, security, data, product, budget, and operations owners approve their waves. Live content movement, dual writes, cutover, and deletion require separate explicit approval.

Error Handling

  • Do not claim parity from happy-path samples only.
  • Do not map a retired Lightroom service to a different Lightroom API by name.
  • Pause on count, content, provenance, authorization, or cost divergence.

Output

Return capability map, contracts, wave plan, test corpus, parity evidence, decisions, cutover/rollback, cleanup, and owners. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Reconcile a synthetic PDF workflow across source and target.
  • Classify a source capability with no current Adobe equivalent as a gap.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • auth mismatch
  • format drift
  • policy difference
  • duplicate action
  • cost drift
  • rollback

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill