Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

adobe-policy-guardrails

Review Adobe integrations for approved endpoints, versions, data handling, spending limits, and approval requirements. Produce clear allow and deny rules, enforcement points, tests, and evidence so teams can check risky actions before they run.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyze and enforce repository, runtime, data, spend, endpoint, and approval guardrails without guessing secret formats or content-policy rules. Use when the task requires adobe policy and execution guardrails. Trigger with "Adobe guardrails", "block unsafe Adobe calls", or "Adobe policy checks".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Reviewing Adobe API calls before enabling them
  • Blocking obsolete routes or unknown hosts
  • Checking logs for leaked tokens or signed URLs
  • Testing budget limits and expired exceptions

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.2 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Adobe Policy and Execution Guardrails

Overview

Analyze and enforce repository, runtime, data, spend, endpoint, and approval guardrails without guessing secret formats or content-policy rules. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

Guardrails derive from current service docs and local policy: approved auth flows, hosts/versions, scopes/profiles, schemas, storage domains, budgets, data classes, and approval boundaries. Secret prefixes and prompt regexes are not authoritative security or content-policy controls. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Use mature secret scanners plus entropy/context rules and provider revocation procedures. Runtime authorization evaluates credential binding, entitlement, resource, operation, and approval.

Instructions

  1. Inventory all Adobe calls, credentials, endpoints, versions, payload classes, storage URLs, retries, jobs, events, and destructive operations.
  2. Create allowlists for current hosts/versions/services and denylists for JWT, /sensei/cutout, and retired Lightroom Firefly Services.
  3. Validate configuration/request/response schemas and redact tokens, signed URLs, prompts, and customer content.
  4. Enforce data-purpose, owner, budget, concurrency, idempotency, and approval tokens before side effects.
  5. Route Adobe policy outcomes to a human-readable denial path; never silently rewrite prompts or broaden scopes.
  6. Test bypasses, stale docs, false positives, emergency disablement, exception expiry, and audit receipts.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Security/product/data/budget owners approve policy and exceptions. Generation, upload, deploy, webhook change, cancellation, replay, and deletion remain independently approved actions.

Error Handling

  • Do not claim Adobe secrets always have a specific prefix.
  • Do not claim local regexes predict Firefly policy decisions.
  • Fail closed when endpoint/version or approval evidence is unknown.

Output

Return policy sources, allow/deny rules, enforcement points, test corpus, exceptions, receipts, drift monitor, and owners. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Block /sensei/cutout before network execution.
  • Detect a signed URL in a log fixture and fail the gate.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • obsolete route
  • unknown host
  • secret leak
  • policy outcome
  • budget ceiling
  • expired exception

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill