Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

adobe-reliability-patterns

Design recovery controls for asynchronous Adobe workloads, including duplicate prevention, time-limited status checks, service-specific queues, and failure isolation. Produce state models and recovery runbooks that help teams investigate uncertain jobs before approving a replay.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyze and design idempotency, bounded polling, per-service circuits, durable queues, DLQ/replay, degradation, and reconciliation for Adobe workloads. Use when the task requires adobe async reliability controls. Trigger with "Adobe reliability", "Firefly retry design", or "PDF job recovery".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Plan recovery after a submission-time crash
  • Investigate an unknown job before replay
  • Design service isolation and outage recovery drills

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Adobe Async Reliability Controls

Overview

Analyze and design idempotency, bounded polling, per-service circuits, durable queues, DLQ/replay, degradation, and reconciliation for Adobe workloads. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Adobe documentation for every selected service, API version, auth flow, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, identity, security, data, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures with secret and content canaries.

Current Contract

Adobe services fail independently and async submission may succeed before the caller sees a response. Reliability is a state machine: planned, approved, submitted, acknowledged, running, terminal, artifact verified, downstream acknowledged, and cleaned. Unknown is not failed or safe to replay. Recheck the dated evidence map before relying on mutable product behavior.

Authentication

Idempotency records and job evidence use aliases and hashes, never tokens, signed URLs, or content. Credential failure and content/policy failure have different containment owners.

Instructions

  1. Map operations, side effects, states, identifiers, retryability, time budgets, dependencies, and reconciliation sources.
  2. Create per-service circuits and queues so one Adobe product does not exhaust all workers.
  3. Persist submission intent before network call and bind returned job/status/cancel evidence atomically.
  4. Poll returned status URLs with jitter, terminal-state validation, cancellation, and strict elapsed-time budget.
  5. Route exhausted/unknown work to quarantine or DLQ; replay only after reconciliation and approval.
  6. Exercise crashes, timeouts, 429/5xx, revocation, vendor outage, duplicate events, and recovery objectives.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, Adobe content, consent, uploads, generation, spend, deployment, registration changes, replay, cancellation, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Workload owner approves replay/degradation; budget owner approves resubmission; data owner approves artifact custody; security owns credential failures; cancellation/deletion require explicit approval.

Error Handling

  • No fixed timeout table substitutes for measured objectives.
  • Never retry unknown submissions blindly.
  • Fallback output must be labeled and must not bypass policy or approval.

Output

Return state model, retry/idempotency matrix, circuit/queue design, reconciliation and replay runbooks, drills, SLOs, and owners. Mark assumptions, observed environment behavior, owners, evidence dates, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Recover after a crash between submission and response persistence.
  • Reconcile an unknown job before approved replay.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • 429
  • 5xx
  • ambiguous timeout
  • credential revocation
  • duplicate event
  • vendor outage

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Adobe sources before execution.
  • Treat observed tenant or product behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal Adobe guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill