Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

alchemy-ci-integration

Add or strengthen CI checks for Alchemy integrations. The workflow combines deterministic unit and contract tests with secret scans, fork protections, and controlled live checks, producing reviewable evidence for failures such as invalid keys, wrong chains, and unavailable providers.

OriginalShow the original description

Gate Alchemy integration changes with deterministic unit, contract, fork, secret, and negative-path checks. Use when adding Alchemy to CI or hardening an existing pipeline. Trigger with "Alchemy CI", "Alchemy GitHub Actions", or "test Alchemy in CI".

Works withGitHub

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding Alchemy checks to a CI pipeline
  • Hardening GitHub Actions for Alchemy integrations
  • Keeping secrets out of fork pull request workflows
  • Testing invalid keys, wrong chains, and provider failures

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB
  • references/official-docs.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Alchemy Continuous Integration Gate

Overview

Gate Alchemy integration changes with deterministic unit, contract, fork, secret, and negative-path checks. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and negative-path evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Alchemy documentation for the selected product, chain, feature, client, authentication method, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, application, security, data/privacy, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the requested scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures, a credential canary, explicit success criteria, and a tested rollback boundary.

Current Contract

CI should keep most provider behavior deterministic through fixtures and contract tests. A live read or pinned-chain fork is a separately labeled integration gate with a scoped non-production key, bounded usage, and an unavailable-provider policy. Pull-request testing never implies authorization to deploy or transact.

Authentication

Use a least-privilege CI environment secret with no write or wallet-signing authority. Prevent fork-origin workflows from receiving repository secrets and scan logs, artifacts, bundles, source maps, and built assets for canaries.

Instructions

  1. Inventory unit, adapter-contract, fixture, fork, live-read, deployment, and transaction tests and assign each to a trust boundary.
  2. Pin runtime and dependencies; validate fixtures against current documented schemas without requiring live credentials for ordinary pull requests.
  3. Run secret and deprecated-import gates, including a ban on new alchemy-sdk imports and credential-bearing endpoint literals.
  4. Run a scoped live read or pinned-block fork only in an approved trusted context, assert chain identity, cap duration/usage, and retain a redacted receipt.
  5. Keep testnet deployment or transaction simulation in a separate protected job with environment approval and no automatic production promotion.
  6. Prove invalid-key, wrong-chain, provider-unavailable, rate-limited, partial-response, and secret-canary failures before making the gate required.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, wallet addresses, customer data, plan changes, spend, key creation or rotation, webhook changes, deployment, replay, transaction construction, signing, broadcast, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

Repository/security owners approve secret-bearing CI contexts. Release owners approve protected deployment jobs. External fork pull requests never gain secrets solely because a maintainer runs tests.

Error Handling

  • A provider outage must produce the documented gate result; do not silently skip a required live contract.
  • Do not expose secret values in command lines, process dumps, cache keys, or build scans.
  • Do not combine a read-only CI gate with testnet deployment in the same implicit authority boundary.

Output

Return the test-layer map, workflow/config change, secret and fork policy, deterministic fixtures, live-gate budget, negative-path receipts, required/advisory decision, and rollback. Mark assumptions, observations, source dates, environment-specific behavior, owners, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Run fixture-backed adapter tests on every fork PR and a single chain-ID-asserted live read only after the trusted environment gate.
  • Fail a build that reintroduces alchemy-sdk or embeds an Alchemy endpoint credential in a source map.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • fork PR without secrets
  • invalid key
  • wrong chain
  • provider unavailable
  • HTTP 200 partial error
  • secret canary in artifact

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Alchemy sources before execution.
  • Treat observed account, application, network, indexer, chain, or provider behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill