Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

alchemy-debug-bundle

Assemble a reproducible Alchemy incident bundle with sanitized environment details, request IDs, timing, status evidence, and reproduction results. It helps teams prepare support evidence while screening out credentials and sensitive customer data before sharing.

OriginalShow the original description

Collect a deterministic, secret-safe Alchemy diagnostic bundle for triage and escalation. Use when a provider issue needs reproducible evidence. Trigger with "Alchemy debug bundle", "collect Alchemy diagnostics", or "prepare an Alchemy support case".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Preparing evidence for an Alchemy support case
  • Investigating intermittent Ethereum RPC timeouts
  • Reviewing a diagnostic bundle for leaked secrets

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Alchemy Redacted Diagnostic Bundle

Overview

Collect a deterministic, secret-safe Alchemy diagnostic bundle for triage and escalation. This workflow produces a reviewable artifact and negative-path evidence before any live side effect.

Prerequisites

  • Current first-party Alchemy documentation for the selected product, chain, feature, client, authentication method, limit, and lifecycle.
  • Named product, application, security, data/privacy, budget, release, and operations owners appropriate to the requested scope.
  • Synthetic or approved non-production fixtures, a credential canary, explicit success criteria, and a tested rollback boundary.

Current Contract

A useful diagnostic bundle captures configuration identity, endpoint class, chain, dependency locks, sanitized request and response envelopes, request IDs, timing, retry history, and status observations. It never contains API keys, Admin keys, Notify tokens, signing keys, private keys, raw customer payloads, or credential-bearing URLs.

Authentication

Use a redaction allowlist, not a blacklist. Replace embedded endpoint credentials with a stable one-way fingerprint only when policy permits correlation. Keep the unredacted source in its existing protected system rather than copying it into the bundle.

Instructions

  1. Define the incident window, affected endpoint family, chain, environment, expected behavior, and authorized evidence recipients.
  2. Inventory runtime, package lock, adapter version, configured chain ID, feature, deployment SHA, and key identifier without reading or exporting secret values.
  3. Collect sanitized request/response shapes, HTTP and JSON-RPC status, selected safe headers, request IDs, duration, attempt count, and partial-error fields.
  4. Add current Alchemy status, supported-chain/feature evidence, and account-usage observation from the authorized owner; distinguish observation from inference.
  5. Scan the complete bundle for secret and personal-data canaries, manually review it, then hash the immutable artifact.
  6. Reproduce once with a synthetic fixture where safe, attach the positive or failed receipt, and specify retention and deletion dates.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect current documentation, configuration, code, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved repository artifacts. Skill invocation alone does not authorize network access, credentials, wallet addresses, customer data, plan changes, spend, key creation or rotation, webhook changes, deployment, replay, transaction construction, signing, broadcast, or deletion.

Approval Boundaries

The incident owner approves scope and recipients; security/privacy approve any potentially identifying evidence. Sending a bundle to Alchemy or another external party requires explicit disclosure approval.

Error Handling

  • If redaction cannot be proven, do not export the bundle.
  • Do not install or report the archived alchemy-sdk merely to populate an SDK-version field.
  • A service-status screenshot without request IDs and environment facts is context, not root-cause evidence.

Output

Return the incident manifest, sanitized environment and request facts, status/feature evidence, reproduction receipt, redaction scan, artifact hash, recipients, retention date, and gaps. Mark assumptions, observations, source dates, environment-specific behavior, owners, and unresolved gaps explicitly.

Examples

  • Build a bundle for intermittent Ethereum RPC timeouts containing request IDs and timings but no endpoint URL or address payload.
  • Reject a draft bundle when its command transcript contains the application key in a URL, then rotate if exposure crossed the approved boundary.

Validation

Exercise and record expected and observed results for:

  • secret canary detected
  • customer-address canary detected
  • missing request ID
  • partial error preserved
  • artifact hash reproducible
  • recipient authorization absent

Resources

  • Current first-party evidence map — recheck dated Alchemy sources before execution.
  • Treat observed account, application, network, indexer, chain, or provider behavior as environment-specific evidence, never a universal guarantee.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill