Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-common-errors

Diagnose Algolia failures using the actual status, message, request ID, operation, client version, and target index. It narrows likely causes such as key permissions, endpoint or index mistakes, filters, and unfinished tasks, then validates a minimal correction with safe evidence.

OriginalShow the original description

Diagnose Algolia request, credential, index, task, and query failures from concrete evidence. Use when an integration returns 4xx or 5xx responses, stale results, or unexpected empty hits. Trigger with "debug Algolia error", "Algolia 403", or "Algolia search failed".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Investigating an Algolia 401, 403, 404, or 429 response
  • Finding why search results are empty or stale
  • Checking key permissions and index settings safely

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Error Triage

Overview

This skill turns an Algolia symptom into a reproducible diagnosis. It favors the response status, message, request ID, client version, operation, and target index over generic error folklore.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • A 403 is an authorization fact, not proof that an unrestricted key is required.
  • A successful write is asynchronous; compare the returned task ID and wait behavior before calling data stale.
  • A 404 can identify a missing index, application, route, or regional endpoint; preserve the full response.
  • A 429 must be interpreted from the returned message and current plan or key restrictions, not from a guessed universal quota.

Authentication

Inspect only redacted key metadata and ACL intent. Never print, paste, or replace a credential with an Admin key merely to make a failing request succeed.

Instructions

  1. Capture the smallest failing call, status, message, request ID, application ID suffix, index name, and package version.
  2. Classify the operation as search, indexing, settings, key management, analytics, or events.
  3. Compare the operation with the intended key ACLs and index restrictions.
  4. Reproduce against a safe test index or read-only query with the same client boundary.
  5. Check task completion, index spelling, filters, attributes, and environment routing in that order.
  6. Apply one correction, rerun the minimal reproduction, and record before-and-after evidence.

Approval Boundaries

Do not broaden ACLs, rotate keys, change production settings, or replay writes until the target and failure class are confirmed.

Output

Return the symptom, evidence, root-cause hypothesis, ruled-out alternatives, minimum fix, verification result, and any remaining uncertainty.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
401 or 403Verify application/key pairing and required ACL; do not escalate privilege blindly.
404Confirm endpoint, application, and exact index name.
429Honor the response and measure request pressure before adding bounded retry.
Stale resultWait for the specific task and verify the queried index.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

operation=saveObjects; status=403; index=products_stage

Expected handoff:

cause=missing-addObject-ACL; fix=request-scoped-key; admin-key-used=no

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill