Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-debug-bundle

Collect evidence for reproducible Algolia search or indexing failures, including client versions, reproduction steps, and redacted request details. Package the findings with a file manifest and secret scan results for review before a support handoff.

OriginalShow the original description

Collect a bounded, secret-safe Algolia diagnostic bundle for an incident or support escalation. Use when a reproducible search or indexing failure needs portable evidence. Trigger with "Algolia debug bundle", "collect Algolia diagnostics", or "Algolia support evidence".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Preparing evidence for an Algolia support request
  • Documenting a reproducible search or indexing failure
  • Reviewing diagnostic files for sensitive information

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Redacted Debug Bundle

Overview

This skill assembles code, configuration shape, client versions, redacted request evidence, task IDs, and reproduction steps without copying API keys, full records, or unrestricted account data.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Prefer local configuration names and hashes over live secret or key inspection.
  • Collect the smallest failing request and response; redact credentials, personal data, and unrelated record fields.
  • Include timestamps, regions or hosts, request IDs, task IDs, and client versions when available.
  • Create a manifest before sharing so reviewers can see every included file and redaction rule.

Authentication

Do not fetch, print, validate, or transmit secret values. If a support workflow needs account evidence, use a separately approved read-only credential and preserve only redacted results.

Instructions

  1. Define the incident, recipient, allowed data classes, time window, and maximum bundle size.
  2. Inspect local dependencies, wrapper code, environment variable names, index configuration, and recent relevant logs.
  3. Reproduce one safe read or disposable-index operation and capture redacted request metadata.
  4. Scan every artifact for keys, tokens, emails, user tokens, record payloads, and unrelated secrets.
  5. Build a plain-text manifest with collection source, hash, redaction action, and omission reason.
  6. Review the manifest and bundle contents before any external transfer.

Approval Boundaries

Do not use an Admin key for diagnosis, archive an entire environment, collect production records wholesale, or send the bundle automatically.

Output

Return the reproduction, dependency versions, redacted evidence, artifact manifest, secret-scan result, omitted evidence, and a human-approved handoff path.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Potential secret foundRemove the artifact or redact it, then rescan.
Reproduction mutates productionStop and move to a disposable target.
Bundle exceeds limitNarrow the time window and fields.
Required evidence is sensitiveDescribe the gap and request an approved channel.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

incident=ALG-42; window=10m; target=products_readonly; bundle-limit=5MB

Expected handoff:

artifacts=7; secret-scan=pass; production-records=0; transfer=pending-review

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill