Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-migration-deep-dive

Plan and carry out a migration to Algolia by mapping data, queries, filters, and ranking behavior. Validate a new index against representative searches, then prepare an approved traffic cutover with acceptance criteria and a rollback procedure.

OriginalShow the original description

Plan and execute a reversible migration from another search system or legacy index design to Algolia. Use when translating schemas, queries, relevance behavior, or production traffic. Trigger with "migrate to Algolia", "Algolia cutover", or "search engine migration".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Migrating an existing search system to Algolia
  • Checking search results and interface behavior before migration
  • Planning a production cutover with rollback steps

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Search Migration

Overview

This skill treats migration as a measured compatibility program: source data, query semantics, ranking, filters, UI behavior, traffic, and rollback are assessed separately before cutover.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Preserve the source system as the rollback authority until acceptance criteria pass.
  • Translate capabilities from observed queries and product journeys, not feature-name similarity.
  • Build a new target index and avoid in-place destructive conversion.
  • Compare relevance with a representative, owner-approved query set and explicit tolerances.

Authentication

Use separate least-privilege credentials for source reads, Algolia writes, and browser search. Keep all secret material outside migration artifacts.

Instructions

  1. Inventory source schema, analyzers, queries, filters, facets, ranking behavior, traffic, and operational constraints.
  2. Define the Algolia record model, stable IDs, settings, synonyms, rules, and unsupported semantic gaps.
  3. Backfill a new target index from a reproducible source snapshot and retain task receipts.
  4. Run structural checks, representative query comparisons, latency observations, and UI acceptance tests.
  5. Shadow or canary traffic when available, with named rollback thresholds and owners.
  6. Cut over only after approval, then reconcile drift and retain the rollback window.

Approval Boundaries

Do not overwrite the current production index, declare relevance equivalence from a few queries, or retire the source system before rollback expiry.

Output

Return the capability map, data transform, gap register, backfill evidence, query comparison, cutover plan, acceptance decision, and rollback procedure.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Unsupported query featureDocument the gap and design an approved product alternative.
Record counts differReconcile filtering, deletes, and source snapshot boundaries.
Relevance regressesKeep source traffic and tune against the approved query set.
Rollback data driftsDefine dual-write or replay before cutover.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

source=legacy-search; snapshot=snap-184; target=products_algolia_next

Expected handoff:

records=reconciled; query-suite=198/200; two-gaps=owner-review; cutover=not-started

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill