Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-multi-env-setup

Set up separate Algolia search targets for development, staging, previews, and production. Define environment selection, credential scopes, reviewed promotion of search settings and data, and cleanup rules for temporary indices, the collections that hold searchable records.

OriginalShow the original description

Design isolated Algolia development, staging, preview, and production targets with explicit promotion rules. Use when environments share credentials or index names, or previews need bounded search data. Trigger with "Algolia environments", "Algolia staging setup", or "preview index".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Separating search credentials and indices by environment
  • Limiting preview search to approved test data
  • Defining reviewed promotion of search settings
  • Planning cleanup for temporary search indices

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Multi-Environment Setup

Overview

This skill makes environment isolation an application-owned contract. It does not assume one provider topology: separate applications, index namespaces, or a combination may be selected from security, data, cost, and operational requirements.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Map every runtime environment to an explicit application ID, index namespace, credential owner, and data classification.
  • Prevent preview or branch input from selecting an arbitrary production index.
  • Promote versioned settings and transforms through review rather than copying unknown live state.
  • Define lifecycle and cleanup for ephemeral indices before creating them.

Authentication

Use separate custom keys and secret scopes for each environment. Browser builds receive only the search credential for their resolved environment.

Instructions

  1. Inventory applications, indices, replicas, keys, deployment environments, data sources, and retention rules.
  2. Choose isolation boundaries based on blast radius, data policy, feature parity, and verified current commercial terms.
  3. Implement an allowlisted environment resolver with no production fallback for unknown values.
  4. Define reproducible record, settings, synonym, and rule promotion artifacts.
  5. Test cross-environment denial, preview naming, cleanup, and production-selection safeguards.
  6. Document owners, rotation, promotion, rollback, retention, and orphan-index review.

Approval Boundaries

Do not create applications, copy production data, share keys, or delete preview indices until topology and data-policy owners approve.

Output

Return the environment matrix, selected topology and tradeoffs, configuration resolver, key scopes, promotion flow, isolation tests, and lifecycle controls.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Unknown environmentFail closed instead of selecting production.
Preview requests production dataReject unless an explicit approved sanitized source exists.
Settings driftRebuild from versioned artifacts and review the diff.
Orphan cleanup uncertainReport candidates without deleting them.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

env=preview-482; app=nonprod; index=preview_482_products; data=synthetic

Expected handoff:

resolver=allowlisted; prod-fallback=none; cleanup-after=reviewed-policy

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill