Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-observability

Plan observability for an application's Algolia search journey. Define measurements for availability, latency, index freshness, relevance, and event health, then map them to dashboards, alerts, traces, and service objectives using product baselines.

OriginalShow the original description

Instrument an Algolia integration for actionable availability, latency, freshness, relevance, and event-health signals. Use when defining dashboards, alerts, traces, or service objectives. Trigger with "monitor Algolia", "Algolia metrics", or "search observability".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Planning dashboards for an Algolia search journey
  • Separating application and provider latency
  • Monitoring index freshness after publication
  • Defining alerts from measured service baselines

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Search Observability

Overview

This skill instruments the application-owned search journey rather than substituting generic provider claims. It connects client outcomes, request IDs, index publication, source freshness, and product-level relevance indicators.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Derive thresholds and objectives from the product SLO and measured baseline; do not use universal latency numbers.
  • Separate application latency from Algolia request latency and rendering time.
  • Track source snapshot to completed indexing task to searchable sentinel for freshness.
  • Treat event delivery and query-ID coverage as their own health surface.

Authentication

Telemetry must exclude API keys, raw personal data, sensitive queries, and unrestricted record payloads. Use approved read-only monitoring access where provider data is needed.

Instructions

  1. Define the user journey, owned SLOs, current baseline, and incident-routing owner.
  2. Instrument operation, outcome, duration, index alias, environment, SDK version, request ID, and bounded retry count.
  3. Add freshness markers linking source snapshot, task completion, and searchable sentinel.
  4. Measure no-result and event coverage using privacy-reviewed aggregation.
  5. Build dashboards and alerts from sustained error-budget or baseline deviation, not a copied threshold.
  6. Test telemetry during success, denial, timeout, stale-index, and event-failure scenarios.

Approval Boundaries

Do not log secrets or raw sensitive queries, create arbitrary alert thresholds, or enable high-cardinality labels without review.

Output

Return the signal catalog, field and redaction schema, SLO mapping, dashboards, alerts, synthetic checks, test evidence, and known blind spots.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Request ID unavailablePreserve local trace correlation and full redacted error metadata.
High cardinality detectedAggregate or hash approved identifiers.
Provider and app latency differSplit the spans and investigate the dominant segment.
No product SLO existsReport measurements and request an owner decision.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

journey=product-search; slo=company-owned; fields=operation,outcome,duration,index

Expected handoff:

secret-fields=blocked; freshness-sentinel=pass; alert-threshold=baseline-derived

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill