Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-prod-checklist

Review an Algolia search release before production by checking relevance, credentials, indexing, event tracking, monitoring, and rollback evidence. It produces a release-bound checklist with failed gates, approved waivers, and a clear go or no-go decision.

OriginalShow the original description

Run a fail-closed production readiness review for an Algolia-backed search release. Use when promoting new indices, settings, credentials, UI behavior, or event tracking. Trigger with "Algolia production checklist", "search go-live", or "Algolia launch review".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Preparing a new search index for production
  • Reviewing changed Algolia settings or credentials
  • Checking search UI, events, and monitoring before launch
  • Confirming rollback readiness for a search release

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.8 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Production Readiness Review

Overview

This skill consolidates the release evidence needed to decide whether an Algolia search surface is ready. It uses organization-owned SLOs and policies rather than hard-coded latency or response targets.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Bind all evidence to a release SHA, target application, index state, and source snapshot.
  • Verify least-privilege browser, server, indexing, monitoring, and event credentials separately.
  • Exercise representative relevance, filter, facet, empty-state, error, and accessibility paths.
  • Require tested rollback for both application code and index or settings state.

Authentication

Confirm secret-store ownership, key ACLs, index restrictions, rotation, and exposure scans. Never include credential values in the readiness packet.

Instructions

  1. Freeze the candidate SHA and inventory code, records, settings, synonyms, rules, keys, and event surfaces.
  2. Run schema, unit, integration, security, accessibility, and representative query gates.
  3. Verify indexing tasks, counts, sentinel records, environment mapping, and rollback target.
  4. Review observability against owned SLOs and exercise alert or incident routing.
  5. Validate event consent, stable user tokens, query IDs, and provider event validation where applicable.
  6. Record pass, fail, waiver owner, evidence link, expiration, and final go/no-go decision.

Approval Boundaries

Do not waive a failed security, rollback, data-integrity, or required branch-protection gate without the named authority and durable evidence.

Output

Return a release-bound checklist, evidence links, failed and waived gates, credential matrix, rollback rehearsal, approvers, and explicit go/no-go outcome.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Evidence belongs to another SHARerun or reject it.
Rollback not rehearsedHold production promotion.
Threshold has no ownerTreat it as observation, not a gate.
Required gate pendingOutcome remains no-go.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

release=abc123; app=production; index=products_20260910; source=snap-184

Expected handoff:

required=31/31-pass; waivers=0; rollback=rehearsed; decision=go

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill