Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-reference-architecture

Plan or review an Algolia search system by mapping its data sources, indexing, queries, user interface, permissions, and operations. Get documented architecture decisions, failure handling, validation steps, and a phased rollout with a rollback path.

OriginalShow the original description

Design or review an Algolia search architecture across source data, indexing, query, UI, events, and operations. Use when establishing system boundaries or evaluating an existing integration. Trigger with "Algolia architecture", "design search platform", or "review Algolia integration".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Planning a new Algolia search integration
  • Reviewing an existing search architecture
  • Defining tenant access and indexing boundaries
  • Preparing rollout and rollback steps

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Reference Architecture

Overview

This skill produces an evidence-backed architecture tailored to the repository. It avoids presenting optional Algolia products or provider features as mandatory and makes trust, data, and failure boundaries explicit.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • The source system remains authoritative; Algolia is a derived search projection.
  • Separate indexing, browser search, server search, events, analytics, and workforce administration trust zones.
  • Version record transforms and search configuration with the application.
  • Design task completion, reconciliation, observability, and rollback before production cutover.

Authentication

Assign distinct least-privilege credentials to each machine actor and use provider team controls for human access. Generate tenant-scoped secured keys only on trusted servers.

Instructions

  1. Map current components, data stores, producers, consumers, credentials, indices, and deployment environments.
  2. Define the record contract, stable identity, deletion semantics, settings ownership, and freshness objective.
  3. Choose query and UI boundaries, including browser versus server execution and tenant restrictions.
  4. Add event flow only where consent, user-token, query-ID, and validation requirements are owned.
  5. Model failures for source lag, partial indexing, key denial, provider degradation, and relevance regressions.
  6. Produce architecture decisions, interfaces, tests, observability, rollout, and rollback.

Approval Boundaries

Do not select paid features, centralize unrestricted credentials, or authorize a migration solely from a generic reference diagram.

Output

Return the as-is and proposed boundaries, data and trust flows, decision records, interfaces, failure modes, security controls, validation plan, and phased rollout.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Repository contradicts assumed topologyFollow repository evidence and revise the design.
Feature entitlement unknownMark it optional pending current account confirmation.
Trust boundary crosses browserReplace write access with a backend capability.
Rollback projection missingAdd a retained prior target or rebuild path.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

scope=catalog-search; source=postgres; consumers=web,mobile; tenants=120

Expected handoff:

projection=versioned; browser=secured-search; indexing=job-key; rollback=prior-index

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill