Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

algolia-security-basics

Review an Algolia integration for exposed write-capable keys, overly broad index access, and records visible to search users. The skill maps credentials and permissions, checks tenant restrictions, and produces findings, remediation steps, and a key rotation plan.

OriginalShow the original description

Audit and harden Algolia credentials, record exposure, index restrictions, and tenant search controls. Use when reviewing frontend keys, backend ACLs, key rotation, or data visibility. Trigger with "secure Algolia", "Algolia key audit", or "Algolia security review".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Audit Algolia keys and permissions
  • Check whether search exposes sensitive records
  • Review tenant-specific search restrictions
  • Plan key rotation and incident response

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Algolia Security Baseline

Overview

This skill reviews the actual security boundary of an Algolia integration. A browser search-only key is intentionally visible, so record contents, index restrictions, secured-key design, and abuse controls remain essential.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository, environment, and Algolia application or index in scope
  • The local lockfile and installed client types as implementation authority
  • A safe read-only query or explicitly disposable test target
  • Current first-party documentation for any provider behavior that affects the change

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect local code, configuration names, tests, and dependency versions. Use WebFetch only for current official Algolia documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Never index data that must remain secret merely because an attribute is not displayed.
  • Use custom main keys with minimum ACLs and restrictions; rotate long-lived keys under an owned policy.
  • Generate secured keys on a trusted backend and require restrictions appropriate to the user or tenant.
  • Treat referer restrictions, rate limits, filters, and ACLs as layers whose current behavior must be verified.

Authentication

Inspect key metadata without exporting secret values. Admin credentials stay out of application defaults, browser bundles, logs, support artifacts, and developer examples.

Instructions

  1. Inventory every application ID, environment variable, client constructor, key owner, ACL, restriction, and exposed index.
  2. Scan source, built assets, history, logs, and documentation for write-capable key exposure.
  3. Review record fields and index settings for data a search-only client could retrieve or scrape.
  4. Map backend operations to custom key ACLs and tenant search to secured-key restrictions.
  5. Test allowed and denied paths, including cross-index and cross-tenant attempts.
  6. Document rotation, revocation, incident response, ownership, exceptions, and retest dates.

Approval Boundaries

Do not rotate or revoke production keys, alter index restrictions, or remove access until dependencies and recovery paths are verified.

Output

Return the key and actor inventory, exposure findings, data-visibility review, allowed/denied tests, remediation plan, rotation procedure, and residual risks.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Write key found in browserContain and rotate through the incident process.
Search key exposes sensitive recordsRemove the data and review index design.
Tenant restriction bypassedDisable affected path and correct server-generated restrictions.
Key owner unknownTreat it as orphaned and investigate before revocation.

Examples

Use this compact input and expected handoff to calibrate scope and evidence quality.

Input:

app=APP…9X; actors=browser,indexer,ops; indices=products_*

Expected handoff:

browser=search-only; indexer=custom-minimum; tenant-denial=pass; exposed-write-key=none

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill