Analyze liquidity pools on Uniswap, Curve, and Balancer using deposits, trading volume, and fees. Estimate returns from supplying funds, compare price-change losses against holding tokens, and export pool comparisons as JSON or CSV.
Analyze DEX liquidity pools for TVL, volume, fees, impermanent loss, and LP profitability. Use when analyzing liquidity pools, calculating impermanent loss, or comparing DEX pools. Trigger with phrases like "analyze liquidity pool", "calculate impermanent loss", "LP returns", "pool TVL", "DEX pool metrics", or "compare pools".
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Analyze DEX liquidity pools across Uniswap, Curve, and Balancer to evaluate TVL, trading volume, fee income, and impermanent loss risk. Compare pools across protocols and chains to identify optimal LP opportunities.
Analyze a specific pool by address or token pair:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --pool 0x88e6a0c2ddd26feeb64f039a2c41296fcb3f5640
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --pair ETH/USDC --protocol uniswap-v3
Calculate impermanent loss for a price change:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --il-calc --entry-price 2000 --current-price 3000 # 2000/3000 = ETH price at entry/now in USD
Project IL for various scenarios:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --il-scenarios --token-pair ETH/USDC
Estimate LP returns with fee APR and position projections:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --pool [address] --detailed
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --pool [address] --position 10000 # 10000 = LP position size in USD
Compare pools across protocols or fee tiers:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --compare --pair ETH/USDC --protocols uniswap-v3,curve,balancer
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --compare --pair ETH/USDC --fee-tiers 0.05,0.30,1.00
Export results to JSON or CSV:
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --pool [address] --format json --output pool_analysis.json
python ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/pool_analyzer.py --compare --pair ETH/USDC --format csv --output pools.csv
Pool analysis reports include chain, TVL, 24h volume, fee tier, fee APR, volume/TVL ratio, and token composition with current price. Impermanent loss reports show IL percentage, dollar impact, HODL vs LP value comparison, and breakeven analysis with days-to-recover based on fee income.
See references/implementation.md for detailed output format examples.
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Pool not found | Wrong address or chain | Verify address and target chain |
| Subgraph timeout | API latency or downtime | Uses cached data with warning |
| Invalid pair | Unsupported protocol | Check supported protocols list |
Analyze top ETH/USDC pool - Full TVL, volume, and fee breakdown on Uniswap V3:
python pool_analyzer.py --pair ETH/USDC --protocol uniswap-v3 --chain ethereum
Calculate IL for 2x price increase - See dollar impact vs holding:
python pool_analyzer.py --il-calc --entry-price 100 --current-price 200 # 100/200 = token price at entry/now in USD
Compare Uniswap fee tiers - Find optimal fee tier for ETH/USDC:
python pool_analyzer.py --compare --pair ETH/USDC --fee-tiers 0.05,0.30,1.00
Export all ETH pairs - Dump pool data for further analysis:
python pool_analyzer.py --token ETH --format json --output eth_pools.json
references/implementation.md - Detailed output formats, configuration, cross-protocol comparison guideNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.
Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.
Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.
Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.
Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.
Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.