Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

anima-debug-bundle

Create a focused JSON diagnostic bundle for Anima SDK or Figma integration failures. It records SDK and Node.js versions, token presence without token values, and connectivity status, so you can review and redact evidence before attaching it to a support request.

OriginalShow the original description

Collect Anima SDK debug evidence for support tickets and troubleshooting. Use when filing Anima support requests, debugging code generation issues, or collecting diagnostic data for the Anima team. Trigger with: "anima debug bundle", "anima support ticket", "anima diagnostics".

Works withFigma

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Preparing reviewed diagnostic evidence for an Anima support ticket
  • Checking whether a staging Figma connection is reachable
  • Investigating an Anima SDK loading or code generation failure

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB
  • references/official-docs.md764 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Anima Debug Bundle

Overview

Collect a narrowly scoped, redactable diagnostic artifact for a reproducible Anima or Figma integration failure. Review the file locally before sharing it: token-presence indicators are acceptable; credential values, private design content, and personal identity data are not.

Prerequisites

  • A scoped development credential and a disposable/staging design fixture that reproduces the issue without exposing a customer or private production file.
  • The expected file/node/settings tuple, timestamp, and sanitized error or request ID to correlate the bundle with the reported issue.
  • A support-sharing review process and an owner able to rotate credentials if a diagnostic artifact is found to contain sensitive material.

Instructions

Build the bundle locally, inspect its exact fields, run a secret scan, and share it only after the support owner confirms that every value is safe.

Step 1: Generate Debug Bundle

// src/debug/anima-debug.ts
import fs from 'node:fs';
import path from 'node:path';
import { createRequire } from 'node:module';

const require = createRequire(import.meta.url);

function errorClass(error: unknown): string {
  return error instanceof Error ? error.name : 'UnknownError';
}

async function generateDebugBundle() {
  const bundle = {
    timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
    environment: {
      nodeVersion: process.version,
      sdkVersion: require('@animaapp/anima-sdk/package.json').version,
      animaToken: process.env.ANIMA_TOKEN ? 'SET (redacted)' : 'NOT SET',
      figmaToken: process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN ? 'SET (redacted)' : 'NOT SET',
    },
    figmaAccess: await testFigmaAccess(),
    sdkLoad: await testSdkLoad(),
  };

  const outputDir = path.resolve(process.env.DEBUG_OUTPUT_DIR || '.private-debug');
  fs.mkdirSync(outputDir, { recursive: true, mode: 0o700 });
  const filename = path.join(outputDir, `anima-debug-${Date.now()}.json`);
  fs.writeFileSync(filename, JSON.stringify(bundle, null, 2), { mode: 0o600, flag: 'wx' });
  console.log({ debugBundleCreated: true, outputDir });
  return bundle;
}

async function testFigmaAccess() {
  try {
    const res = await fetch('https://api.figma.com/v1/me', {
      headers: { 'X-Figma-Token': process.env.FIGMA_TOKEN! },
    });
    return { status: res.ok ? 'ok' : 'failed', httpStatus: res.status };
  } catch (error: unknown) {
    return { status: 'failed', errorClass: errorClass(error) };
  }
}

async function testSdkLoad() {
  try {
    const { Anima } = await import('@animaapp/anima-sdk');
    new Anima({ auth: { token: process.env.ANIMA_TOKEN! } });
    return { status: 'sdk_loaded', version: 'check package.json' };
  } catch (error: unknown) {
    return { status: 'sdk_failed', errorClass: errorClass(error) };
  }
}

generateDebugBundle().catch(() => {
  console.error({ failureClass: 'debug-bundle-failed' });
  process.exitCode = 1;
});

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep to inspect the existing integration and generated diff before changing anything. Use Write or Edit only inside the approved generated-code, test, or configuration paths. Use the declared Bash commands only for the explicit install, validation, or diagnostic steps in this workflow; never print tokens, source designs, generated source, or private website captures.

Output

  • JSON debug bundle with SDK version, token status, and connectivity test
  • Figma API access verification
  • Candidate support artifact pending local field review and secret scan

Examples

When generation fails against a staging component, run the bundle generator with scoped credentials and inspect the JSON before attaching it to a support ticket. Confirm that it contains SDK version, token state, and sanitized connectivity result—but not token values, the full design payload, or a private file name. Attach the bundle with the problem timestamp and request ID. If the review finds sensitive content or the test cannot reproduce safely, do not upload the file; quarantine it, rotate an exposed credential if needed, reduce the captured fields, and regenerate the diagnostic.

Error Handling

FailureResponse
Diagnostic credentials are missing or invalidStop the run and correct the managed secret binding without printing values.
Figma or SDK check failsRecord only status/error category and attach the sanitized context to the incident.
Bundle contains sensitive dataQuarantine it, rotate affected credentials, improve redaction, and regenerate.
Issue cannot be reproduced in stagingEscalate with minimal non-sensitive metadata rather than collecting production design content.

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill