Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

anth-enterprise-rbac

Set up organization, Workspace, and role-based access rules for Anthropic teams. The skill helps map people and services to limited permissions, constrain model and usage access, and plan key rotation, revocation, and sandbox checks.

OriginalShow the original description

Configure Anthropic enterprise organization management, Workspaces, and role-based access control for teams. Trigger with phrases like "anthropic enterprise", "claude rbac", "anthropic workspaces", "claude team access", "anthropic organization".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Mapping team members to Console roles and Workspaces
  • Setting model and request limits by application role
  • Checking key rotation and revocation procedures
  • Testing access rules in a sandbox workspace

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Anthropic Enterprise RBAC

Overview

Anthropic provides organization-level access control through Workspaces, API key scoping, and member roles via the Console at console.anthropic.com.

Organization Structure

Organization (billing entity)
├── Workspace: Production
│   ├── API Key: sk-ant-api03-prod-main-...
│   ├── API Key: sk-ant-api03-prod-batch-...
│   └── Rate limits: Tier 4
├── Workspace: Staging
│   ├── API Key: sk-ant-api03-stg-...
│   └── Rate limits: Tier 2
└── Workspace: Development
    ├── API Key: sk-ant-api03-dev-...
    └── Rate limits: Tier 1

Console Roles

RoleCapabilities
OwnerFull access, billing, member management
AdminManage workspaces, API keys, view usage
DeveloperCreate/revoke own API keys, view own usage
BillingView invoices and usage reports only

Application-Level RBAC

# Implement your own RBAC on top of Anthropic Workspaces
from enum import Enum
import anthropic

class UserRole(Enum):
    VIEWER = "viewer"       # Can read Claude responses (no direct API)
    USER = "user"           # Can send prompts (rate limited)
    POWER_USER = "power"    # Can use Opus, higher limits
    ADMIN = "admin"         # Can access all models, no limits

ROLE_CONFIG = {
    UserRole.VIEWER: {"allowed": False},
    UserRole.USER: {
        "allowed": True,
        "models": ["claude-haiku-4-20250514"],
        "max_tokens": 512,
        "rpm_limit": 10,
    },
    UserRole.POWER_USER: {
        "allowed": True,
        "models": ["claude-haiku-4-20250514", "claude-sonnet-4-20250514", "claude-opus-4-20250514"],
        "max_tokens": 4096,
        "rpm_limit": 60,
    },
    UserRole.ADMIN: {
        "allowed": True,
        "models": ["claude-haiku-4-20250514", "claude-sonnet-4-20250514", "claude-opus-4-20250514"],
        "max_tokens": 8192,
        "rpm_limit": 200,
    },
}

def create_message(user_role: UserRole, model: str, **kwargs):
    config = ROLE_CONFIG[user_role]
    if not config["allowed"]:
        raise PermissionError("Role does not allow API access")
    if model not in config["models"]:
        raise PermissionError(f"Role cannot access model: {model}")
    kwargs["max_tokens"] = min(kwargs.get("max_tokens", 1024), config["max_tokens"])

    client = anthropic.Anthropic()
    return client.messages.create(model=model, **kwargs)

Key Management Best Practices

PracticeImplementation
One key per serviceprod-auth-service, prod-search-service
Rotate quarterlyCalendar reminder + automated rotation
Least privilegeDev workspace for dev keys only
Audit trailLog which key made each request
Revoke immediatelyOn employee departure or compromise

Error Handling

IssueCauseFix
Key works in dev, fails in prodWrong workspace keyVerify key belongs to prod workspace
New team member can't accessNot added to workspaceInvite via Console > Members
Usage not visibleViewing wrong workspaceSwitch workspace in Console

Prerequisites

  • Obtain the organization owner’s approved workspace map, role matrix, service inventory, key owners, rotation schedule, and incident/revocation contacts.
  • Create isolated dev/staging workspaces with synthetic requests; production changes require an approved change record and least-privileged service identity.
  • Define the allowed models, token/rate budgets, data classes, destinations, and redacted audit fields for each role and service.

Instructions

  1. Map each human and service to the minimum Console role and workspace required for its job. Separate development, staging, and production keys; store them only in the approved secret manager.
  2. Enforce application RBAC before constructing a request, including model, token, rate, data-class, and destination checks. Treat unknown roles, stale memberships, and missing workspace mappings as deny.
  3. Test grants, denials, key rotation, revocation, and cross-workspace isolation with synthetic fixtures. Verify that audit records identify the actor and decision without recording prompts, responses, credentials, or personal data.
  4. Roll out policy changes to one sandbox workspace or internal canary. Require owner approval and review aggregate authorization failures, usage, and spend before production promotion.
  5. On suspected compromise or policy drift, revoke the affected key, disable the route, restore the last approved role policy, and document the redacted evidence.

Output

Produce an RBAC receipt containing policy/version, workspace and service classes, role decision counts, model/token/rate constraints, test and canary outcomes, key rotation/revocation status, approver, and rollback reference. Exclude key values, member emails, prompts, responses, and raw Console exports.

Examples

In a sandbox, assign fixture-service the user role, request a permitted Haiku call, and assert an Opus request is denied with decision=deny; reason=model_scope; prompt_logged=0. Rotate the synthetic service key, verify the old key is rejected, and record only the redacted receipt.

Resources

Next Steps

For major migration strategies, see anth-migration-deep-dive.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill