Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

anth-migration-deep-dive

Plan a move from OpenAI, Gemini, or another LLM provider to the Claude API. Map request and response fields, prompts, and tool definitions, and structure a provider-neutral adapter. Compare providers with synthetic fixtures and prepare a canary or rollback plan.

OriginalShow the original description

Migrate to Claude API from OpenAI, Gemini, or other LLM providers. Use when switching from GPT-4 to Claude, migrating from Text Completions, or building a multi-provider abstraction layer. Trigger with phrases like "migrate to claude", "openai to anthropic", "switch from gpt to claude", "multi-provider llm".

Works withOpenAIGemini

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Move an application from OpenAI to Claude
  • Translate system prompts and tool definitions
  • Build an adapter for multiple LLM providers
  • Compare provider behavior with synthetic test cases

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Anthropic Migration Deep Dive

Overview

Migration strategies for switching to Claude from OpenAI, Google, or other LLM providers, including API mapping, prompt translation, and multi-provider abstraction.

OpenAI to Anthropic API Mapping

OpenAIAnthropicNotes
openai.ChatCompletion.create()anthropic.messages.create()Different response shape
model: "gpt-4"model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"Different model IDs
messages: [{role, content}]messages: [{role, content}]Same format
functions / toolstoolsSimilar but different schema key names
function_calltool_choiceDifferent naming
response.choices[0].message.contentresponse.content[0].textDifferent access path
stream: true → yields chunksstream: true → SSE eventsDifferent event format
System message in messages[]system parameter (separate)Claude separates system prompt
n (multiple completions)Not supportedUse multiple requests
logprobsNot supportedN/A

Side-by-Side Code Comparison

# === OpenAI ===
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are helpful."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}
    ],
    max_tokens=1024,
    temperature=0.7
)
text = response.choices[0].message.content

# === Anthropic ===
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    system="You are helpful.",           # System prompt is separate
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}
    ],
    max_tokens=1024,                     # Required (not optional)
    temperature=0.7
)
text = response.content[0].text

Tool Use Migration

# OpenAI tools format
openai_tools = [{
    "type": "function",
    "function": {
        "name": "get_weather",
        "parameters": {"type": "object", "properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}}}
    }
}]

# Anthropic tools format — flatter structure
anthropic_tools = [{
    "name": "get_weather",
    "description": "Get weather for a city",  # Required in Anthropic
    "input_schema": {"type": "object", "properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}}}
}]

Multi-Provider Abstraction

from abc import ABC, abstractmethod

class LLMProvider(ABC):
    @abstractmethod
    def complete(self, prompt: str, system: str = "", **kwargs) -> str: ...

class AnthropicProvider(LLMProvider):
    def __init__(self):
        import anthropic
        self.client = anthropic.Anthropic()

    def complete(self, prompt: str, system: str = "", **kwargs) -> str:
        msg = self.client.messages.create(
            model=kwargs.get("model", "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"),
            max_tokens=kwargs.get("max_tokens", 1024),
            system=system,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
        )
        return msg.content[0].text

class OpenAIProvider(LLMProvider):
    def __init__(self):
        from openai import OpenAI
        self.client = OpenAI()

    def complete(self, prompt: str, system: str = "", **kwargs) -> str:
        messages = []
        if system:
            messages.append({"role": "system", "content": system})
        messages.append({"role": "user", "content": prompt})
        resp = self.client.chat.completions.create(
            model=kwargs.get("model", "gpt-4"),
            messages=messages,
            max_tokens=kwargs.get("max_tokens", 1024)
        )
        return resp.choices[0].message.content

Migration Checklist

  • Map model names (GPT-4 → Claude Sonnet, GPT-3.5 → Claude Haiku)
  • Move system prompts from messages[] to system parameter
  • Update response access path (.choices[0].message.content → .content[0].text)
  • Make max_tokens explicit (required in Anthropic, optional in OpenAI)
  • Update tool definitions to Anthropic format
  • Test prompt behavior (Claude may respond differently to same prompts)
  • Update error handling for Anthropic error types

Prerequisites

  • Inventory provider models, prompts, tools, response consumers, data flows, budgets, and retention rules. Obtain owner approval for the target model/workspace and rollback window.
  • Define a provider-neutral contract with explicit fields for model, token budget, stop reason, tool calls, errors, usage, and correlation ID; keep provider-specific details behind the adapter.
  • Prepare representative synthetic fixtures and a no-op tool registry in a sandbox. Configure redacted comparison logs and exclude prompts, completions, PII, credentials, and tool arguments.

Instructions

  1. Map request and response fields using the tables above, preserving semantics rather than assuming identical tokenization, tool behavior, stop reasons, or safety behavior.
  2. Move system instructions to the Anthropic system parameter, make max_tokens explicit, and validate alternating message roles and tool schemas before calling the target provider.
  3. Run old and new providers in a shadow or replay lane with synthetic fixtures. Compare structured outcomes, latency, token/cost aggregates, refusal/guardrail decisions, and tool-call counts—not raw content in shared logs.
  4. Release behind a feature flag to a small canary with a bounded budget and authorized destinations. Monitor for scope, retention, error, or quality regressions.
  5. Promote only after acceptance evidence is approved. If any invariant fails, disable the flag and restore the prior provider adapter/configuration; delete temporary replay data.

Output

Return a migration receipt containing source/target provider classes, adapter version, mapped capabilities, fixture and comparison counts, aggregate parity metrics, canary decision, rollback reference, and cleanup/retention status. Redact all prompt, completion, tool, account, and credential values.

Error Handling

  • If a source capability has no Anthropic equivalent (for example, multiple completions or logprobs), fail the compatibility check and choose an explicit product fallback; do not silently drop it.
  • If tool schemas or role ordering are invalid, reject before the API call and report the field path without including user content.
  • If shadow results diverge beyond the approved threshold, freeze rollout and keep the source provider active while the prompt/adapter is corrected.
  • If rollback cannot be verified, do not widen the canary; preserve the last known-good deployment and escalate to the owner.

Examples

Replay a synthetic fixture with one system instruction, one user turn, and a no-op get_weather tool through both adapters. Record fixture_count=1; tool_side_effects=0; source_status=pass; target_status=pass; content_logged=0; canary=approved, while comparing content through an access-controlled evaluator rather than the receipt.

Resources

Next Steps

For advanced debugging, see anth-advanced-troubleshooting.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill