Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

api-contract

Create a shared API contract that defines endpoint routes, request and response schemas, TypeScript interfaces, pagination, and error formats. It helps frontend and backend agents implement against the same agreed specification.

OriginalShow the original description

Configure this skill should be used when the user asks about "API contract", "api-contract.md", "shared interface", "TypeScript interfaces", "request response schemas", "endpoint design", or needs guidance on designing contracts that coordinate backend and frontend agents. Use when building or modifying API endpoints. Trigger with phrases like 'create API', 'design endpoint', or 'API scaffold'.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Defining request and response schemas for a new endpoint
  • Aligning frontend and backend work around one API specification
  • Standardizing pagination and error responses across endpoints

Files included (7)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • references/best-practices.md738 B
  • references/errors.md221 B
  • references/examples.md12.4 KB
  • references/pagination.md749 B
  • references/typescript-interfaces.md738 B
  • references/writing-endpoints.md805 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

API Contract

Overview

API Contract guides the creation of api-contract.md files that serve as the shared interface between backend and frontend agents during sprint execution. The contract defines request/response schemas, endpoint routes, TypeScript interfaces, and error formats so that implementation agents build to an agreed specification without direct coordination.

Prerequisites

  • Sprint directory initialized at .claude/sprint/[N]/
  • specs.md with defined feature scope and endpoint requirements
  • Familiarity with RESTful API conventions (HTTP methods, status codes, JSON schemas)
  • TypeScript knowledge for interface definitions (recommended)

Instructions

  1. Create api-contract.md in the sprint directory (.claude/sprint/[N]/api-contract.md). Define each endpoint using the standard format: HTTP method, route path, description, request body, response body with status code, and error codes. See ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/writing-endpoints.md for the full template.
  2. Define TypeScript interfaces for all request and response types. Use explicit types instead of any, mark optional fields with ?, and use string | null for nullable values. Reference ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/typescript-interfaces.md for canonical type patterns.
  3. For list endpoints, include pagination parameters and the PaginatedResponse<T> wrapper. Standardize on page, limit, sort, and order query parameters as documented in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pagination.md.
  4. Document all response states: success (200, 201, 204), client errors (400, 401, 403, 404, 422), and empty states. Use a consistent error response format with code, message, and optional details fields.
  5. Follow best practices from ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/best-practices.md: be specific about field constraints (e.g., "string, required, valid email format"), include request/response examples, reference shared types instead of duplicating, and omit implementation details (no database columns, framework names, or file paths).
  6. Share the contract file path in SPAWN REQUEST blocks so both backend and frontend agents read the same interface definition.

Output

  • api-contract.md containing all endpoint definitions with typed request/response schemas
  • TypeScript interface declarations for User, CreateUserRequest, LoginRequest, AuthResponse, ApiError, and domain-specific types
  • Paginated response wrappers for list endpoints
  • Standardized error format across all endpoints

Error Handling

ErrorCauseSolution
Backend and frontend schemas divergeContract updated without notifying both agentsAlways reference a single api-contract.md; never duplicate endpoint definitions
Missing error response codesContract only documents the happy pathDocument all status codes: 400, 401, 403, 404, 409, 422 per endpoint
Ambiguous field typesUsing string without constraintsSpecify format, length, and validation rules (e.g., "string, required, min 8 chars")
Pagination inconsistencyList endpoints use different parameter namesStandardize on the PaginatedResponse<T> interface for all list endpoints
Type mismatch between JSON and TypeScriptDates serialized inconsistentlyUse ISO 8601 datetime strings; document as "createdAt": "ISO 8601 datetime"

Examples

Authentication endpoint contract:

#### POST /auth/register

Create a new user account.

**Request:**
{
  "email": "string (required, valid email)",
  "password": "string (required, min 8 chars)",
  "name": "string (optional)"
}

**Response (201):**  # HTTP 201 Created
{
  "id": "uuid",
  "email": "string",
  "name": "string | null",
  "createdAt": "ISO 8601 datetime"  # 8601 = configured value
}

**Errors:**
- 400: Invalid request body  # HTTP 400 Bad Request
- 409: Email already exists  # HTTP 409 Conflict
- 422: Validation failed  # HTTP 422 Unprocessable Entity

Paginated list endpoint:

#### GET /products

List products with pagination.

**Query Parameters:**
| Param | Type | Default | Description |
|-------|------|---------|-------------|
| page | integer | 1 | Page number |
| limit | integer | 20 | Items per page (max 100) |
| sort | string | createdAt | Sort field |
| order | string | desc | Sort order (asc/desc) |

**Response (200):**  # HTTP 200 OK
{
  "data": [Product],
  "pagination": { "page": 1, "limit": 20, "total": 150, "totalPages": 8 }
}

Shared TypeScript interface:

interface ApiError {
  code: string;
  message: string;
  details?: Record<string, string[]>;
}

Resources

  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/writing-endpoints.md -- Endpoint definition template and key elements
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/typescript-interfaces.md -- Canonical type definitions and guidelines
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/pagination.md -- Pagination parameters and PaginatedResponse interface
  • ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/best-practices.md -- Contract authoring rules (specificity, DRY, no implementation details)

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill