Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

apify-reference-architecture

Design Apify data collection systems using a standalone scraper, a multi-stage pipeline, or an application integration. Get directory layouts, TypeScript skeletons, input validation, configuration patterns, and health checks suited to the chosen structure.

OriginalShow the original description

Production-grade architecture patterns for Apify-powered applications. Use when designing scraping infrastructure, building multi-Actor pipelines, or integrating Apify into a larger system architecture. Trigger with "apify architecture", "apify best practices", "apify project structure", "scraping architecture", "apify system design".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Designing a standalone Apify scraper
  • Connecting discovery, scraping, and cleanup stages
  • Integrating Apify data into an application
  • Organizing configuration and health checks

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB
  • references/architecture-patterns.md8.6 KB
  • references/implementation.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Apify Reference Architecture

Overview

Production-ready architecture patterns for applications built on Apify. Three patterns scale from a single scraper to a full-stack integration:

  1. Standalone Actor — one scraper deployed to the Apify platform.
  2. Multi-Actor Pipeline — a discover → scrape → transform chain of Actors.
  3. Full-Stack Integration — an application using Apify as a data source behind a service layer.

This skill helps you choose the right pattern, lay out the directory structure, and wire the skeleton code. Full directory trees, diagrams, and code for every pattern live in references/architecture-patterns.md; the service layer, configuration loader, and health check live in references/implementation.md.

Prerequisites

  • Runtime: Node.js >=18, TypeScript, and the Apify CLI (npm i -g apify-cli).
  • Packages: apify + crawlee (inside an Actor), apify-client (calling Actors from an app), zod (input validation).
  • Auth: an Apify API token. Set APIFY_TOKEN in the environment; the Apify SDK and apify-client read it automatically (or pass it explicitly to new ApifyClient({ token })). Never hardcode the token — inject it via env var and validate at startup.
  • Access: Read and Grep the target repository so you can match the recommended layout against the code already on disk before proposing changes.

Instructions

  1. Pick the pattern. One scraper → Pattern 1. A staged workflow that discovers, scrapes, then cleans → Pattern 2. An app that consumes scraped data → Pattern 3.
  2. Grep the existing repo for apify, apify-client, and Actor.main to see what is already wired, so you extend rather than duplicate structure.
  3. Lay out the directory from the pattern's tree in references/architecture-patterns.md. Keep routing, extraction, and validation in separate modules.
  4. Add typed input validation with zod (see src/types.ts in the reference) so bad input fails fast at the Actor boundary instead of mid-crawl.
  5. Isolate every Apify call behind a service layer (Pattern 3) using the ApifyService class in references/implementation.md — the rest of the app never imports apify-client directly.
  6. Load configuration once at startup via loadConfig() and layer per-environment overrides on a single base object; validate required env vars before serving traffic.
  7. Expose an Apify health check so a bad token or platform outage surfaces before a user-facing scrape fails.

Output

Applying this skill produces an architecture, not a running command. Expect:

  • A recommended directory layout for the chosen pattern.
  • Skeleton TypeScript modules (main.ts, types.ts, service layer, config loader, health check).
  • A per-environment configuration strategy and an Apify health signal.
  • For pipelines, an orchestrator that reports per-stage item counts and total USD cost, e.g.:
=== Pipeline Summary ===
Discovered: 320 URLs
Scraped:    298 items
Clean:      271 items
Total cost: $0.4120

Error Handling

IssueCauseSolution
Circular dependenciesService imports serviceUse dependency injection
Missing configEnv var not setValidate at startup with loadConfig()
Pipeline stage failureActor crash mid-pipelineAdd retry logic per stage
State managementTracking run statusUse webhook handler + database
Run not ready errorFetching results before SUCCEEDEDPoll getRunStatus or use a completion webhook

Examples

Standalone Actor entry point — the minimal skeleton; full file in references/architecture-patterns.md:

// src/main.ts
import { Actor } from 'apify';
import { CheerioCrawler } from 'crawlee';
import { router } from './routes/listing';
import { validateInput, ScraperInput } from './types';

await Actor.main(async () => {
  const input = validateInput(await Actor.getInput<ScraperInput>());
  const crawler = new CheerioCrawler({
    requestHandler: router,
    maxRequestsPerCrawl: input.maxItems ?? 100,
    maxConcurrency: input.concurrency ?? 10,
  });
  await crawler.run(input.startUrls.map(s => s.url));
});

Calling an Actor from an app — via the service layer:

const apify = new ApifyService(process.env.APIFY_TOKEN!);
const { runId } = await apify.startScrape(['https://example.com']);
const results = await apify.getResults<ProductOutput>(runId);

More: the multi-stage pipeline orchestrator and the full ApifyService class are in references/architecture-patterns.md and references/implementation.md. For multi-environment setup, see the companion apify-deploy-integration skill.

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill