Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

apollo-ci-integration

Set up GitHub Actions for Apollo.io integrations, including linting, type checks, mock based unit tests, and live API checks on pushes to the main branch. Add a health check and scan source files for hardcoded API keys.

OriginalShow the original description

Configure Apollo.io CI/CD integration. Use when setting up automated testing, continuous integration, or deployment pipelines for Apollo integrations. Trigger with phrases like "apollo ci", "apollo github actions", "apollo pipeline", "apollo ci/cd", "apollo automated tests".

Works withGitHub

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding CI checks to an Apollo integration
  • Testing lead search with mocked API responses
  • Running live API checks after changes reach main

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md7.3 KB
  • references/implementation-guide.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Apollo CI Integration

Overview

Set up CI/CD pipelines for Apollo.io integrations with GitHub Actions. Uses MSW mocks for unit tests (zero API calls), sandbox tokens for staging, and live API tests gated to main branch only. Apollo's sandbox token returns dummy data without consuming credits.

Prerequisites

  • GitHub repository with Actions enabled
  • Apollo master API key + sandbox token
  • Node.js 18+

Instructions

Step 1: Store Secrets in GitHub

# Master API key for integration tests (main branch only)
gh secret set APOLLO_API_KEY --body "$APOLLO_API_KEY"

# Sandbox token for staging tests (safe, no credits)
gh secret set APOLLO_SANDBOX_KEY --body "$APOLLO_SANDBOX_KEY"

Step 2: GitHub Actions Workflow

# .github/workflows/apollo-ci.yml
name: Apollo CI
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]
  pull_request:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  lint-and-typecheck:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm run lint
      - run: npm run typecheck

  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test
        # Unit tests use MSW mocks — zero API calls

  integration-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    needs: [unit-tests]
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with: { node-version: '20', cache: 'npm' }
      - run: npm ci
      - name: Apollo Health Check
        env:
          APOLLO_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.APOLLO_API_KEY }}
        run: |
          STATUS=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" \
            -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY" \
            "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/auth/health")
          echo "Apollo API: HTTP $STATUS"
          [ "$STATUS" = "200" ] || exit 1
      - run: npm run test:integration
        env:
          APOLLO_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.APOLLO_API_KEY }}

  secret-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Check for hardcoded API keys
        run: |
          if grep -rn 'x-api-key.*[a-zA-Z0-9]\{20,\}' src/ --include='*.ts' --include='*.js'; then
            echo "Potential hardcoded API key found!"
            exit 1
          fi
          echo "No hardcoded secrets"

Step 3: MSW-Based Unit Tests

// src/__tests__/apollo.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect, beforeAll, afterAll, afterEach } from 'vitest';
import { setupServer } from 'msw/node';
import { http, HttpResponse } from 'msw';

const BASE = 'https://api.apollo.io/api/v1';
const mockServer = setupServer(
  http.post(`${BASE}/mixed_people/api_search`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({
      people: [{ id: '1', name: 'Jane Doe', title: 'VP Sales' }],
      pagination: { page: 1, per_page: 25, total_entries: 1, total_pages: 1 },
    }),
  ),
  http.post(`${BASE}/people/match`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({
      person: { id: '1', name: 'Jane Doe', email: 'jane@test.com', title: 'VP Sales' },
    }),
  ),
  http.get(`${BASE}/auth/health`, () =>
    HttpResponse.json({ is_logged_in: true }),
  ),
);

beforeAll(() => mockServer.listen());
afterEach(() => mockServer.resetHandlers());
afterAll(() => mockServer.close());

describe('People Search', () => {
  it('returns contacts from search', async () => {
    const { searchPeople } = await import('../workflows/lead-search');
    const result = await searchPeople({ domains: ['test.com'] });
    expect(result.people).toHaveLength(1);
    expect(result.people[0].name).toBe('Jane Doe');
  });

  it('handles 429 errors', async () => {
    mockServer.use(
      http.post(`${BASE}/mixed_people/api_search`, () =>
        HttpResponse.json({ message: 'Rate limited' }, { status: 429 }),
      ),
    );
    const { searchPeople } = await import('../workflows/lead-search');
    await expect(searchPeople({ domains: ['test.com'] })).rejects.toThrow();
  });
});

Step 4: Integration Tests (Live API)

// src/__tests__/integration/apollo-live.test.ts
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import axios from 'axios';

const SKIP = !process.env.APOLLO_API_KEY;
const client = axios.create({
  baseURL: 'https://api.apollo.io/api/v1',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'x-api-key': process.env.APOLLO_API_KEY! },
});

describe.skipIf(SKIP)('Apollo Live Integration', () => {
  it('searches for people at apollo.io', async () => {
    const { data } = await client.post('/mixed_people/api_search', {
      q_organization_domains_list: ['apollo.io'],
      per_page: 5,
    });
    expect(data.people.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
  });

  it('enriches organization by domain', async () => {
    const { data } = await client.get('/organizations/enrich', { params: { domain: 'apollo.io' } });
    expect(data.organization).toBeDefined();
    expect(data.organization.name).toContain('Apollo');
  });
});

Output

  • GitHub Actions workflow with lint, typecheck, unit test, integration test, and secret scan jobs
  • MSW mock server for zero-API-call unit tests in PRs
  • Live integration tests gated to main branch pushes only
  • Apollo health check step before integration tests
  • Secret scanning to prevent API key commits

Examples

For a lead-search change, open a pull request with an MSW fixture that covers both a successful person search and a 429 response. The pull request runs lint, type checking, the mock-only tests, and the secret scan without exposing an Apollo credential or consuming credits. After merge, the protected main workflow performs the health check and the small live integration suite with the repository secret. If the health check is unavailable or the live request returns a non-success status, keep the change deployed only after the incident owner has either restored the provider path or explicitly disabled the live lane; do not broaden PR credentials to make the check pass.

Error Handling

IssueResolution
Secret not foundgh secret list to verify, re-add with gh secret set
Rate limited in CIUnit tests use MSW, integration tests run only on main
Health check failsCheck status.apollo.io; skip flaky on outage
Hardcoded key foundSecret scan job fails the build; rotate the key immediately

Resources

Next Steps

Proceed to apollo-deploy-integration for deployment configuration.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill