Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

assemblyai-rate-limits

Plan AssemblyAI throughput and handle request limit errors by reviewing account capacity, separating operation queues, and bounding retries. Use callbacks, delayed retries, and transcript ID checks to control polling load and repeated submissions.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyze and control AssemblyAI account request limits, concurrency, backoff, and admission queues. Use when handling 429s or planning throughput. Trigger with "AssemblyAI rate limit", "AssemblyAI concurrency", or "AssemblyAI backoff".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Investigate AssemblyAI 429 errors
  • Plan throughput against account concurrency limits
  • Reduce frequent polling with callbacks
  • Design bounded queues and retry controls

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB
  • references/official-docs.md1.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AssemblyAI Capacity and Retry Control

Overview

Control capacity with explicit account limits, queues, and retry budgets. Keep data, credentials, spend, and replay decisions separately governed.

Prerequisites

  • The target repository or integration path and the requested operator outcome.
  • The AssemblyAI project, environment, region, data classification, and accountable owner.
  • Current first-party documentation plus credentials only for a narrowly approved live check.

Current Contract

AssemblyAI documents 20,000 API requests per five minutes plus operation-specific concurrency limits. Limits apply at account level; project keys mirror capacity rather than multiply it. Actual concurrency and autoscaling are account-specific, so use current dashboard and documentation evidence.

Authentication

For live work, inject ASSEMBLYAI_API_KEY from an approved secret manager and send the raw value only in the AssemblyAI Authorization header to the configured first-party host. Never print, commit, place in a URL, or expose it to an untrusted client. Callback secrets and temporary streaming tokens are separate credentials.

Instructions

  1. Inventory submissions, polls, callbacks, gateway calls, and streaming concurrency.
  2. Record current account limits and observed headers.
  3. Allocate separate bounded pools by operation class.
  4. Prefer callbacks to aggressive polling and use durable admission queues.
  5. Honor Retry-After or capped exponential backoff with jitter.
  6. Reconcile transcript IDs before retrying submission and alert on saturation.

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect repository code, configuration, fixtures, and evidence. Use Write and Edit only for approved implementation or documentation changes. Do not call AssemblyAI, upload audio, open a streaming session, mint a token, replay a callback, deploy, rotate a key, or delete a transcript merely because this skill was invoked.

Approval Boundaries

Require an accountable owner before live audio processing, production credential or endpoint changes, paid model or capacity changes, content retention, callback replay, deployment, or deletion. Read-only repository inspection and synthetic offline validation do not authorize live vendor actions.

Failure Modes

  • More keys do not create more account capacity.
  • Auth and validation failures are not retryable.
  • Unbounded polling amplifies outages and competes with submissions.

Output

Return the operation scope, environment, region, contract surface, authorization class, model and feature decisions, deterministic validation results, content-free identifiers, risks, cleanup or rollback state, and a concise pass/fail receipt. Exclude credentials, signed URLs, audio, transcript text, prompts, and customer-derived content.

Example

  • Start with the named environment, approved regional host, synthetic fixture identity, and bounded operation budget.
  • Finish with safe IDs, contract and assertion counts, terminal state, cleanup status, and the decision owner; never reproduce speech content.

Validation

Rerun the smallest relevant deterministic check, compare actual state with the requested outcome and current first-party contract, verify sensitive fields are absent from evidence, and confirm rollback, termination, or deletion state before reporting success.

References

Review the dated first-party evidence map before relying on any model, parameter, limit, price, region, or lifecycle claim.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill