Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

attio-ci-integration

Build automated checks for Attio integration changes using sample responses and response format tests. Produce pull request evidence without changing CRM records, with an optional, explicitly enabled read-only check against the live API.

OriginalShow the original description

Build a bounded CI contract gate for an Attio integration using fixtures, schema checks, and an optional read-only smoke request. Use when Attio changes need pull-request evidence without mutating CRM data. Trigger with "Attio CI", "test Attio integration", or "Attio pull request gate".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding automated checks for Attio integration pull requests
  • Testing pagination, errors, and retry decisions
  • Checking test outputs for exposed secrets or personal data
  • Adding an optional read-only API connection check

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Attio Contract Gate for CI

Overview

This skill turns an Attio integration change into deterministic pull-request evidence. It separates offline contract tests from an explicitly enabled read-only API smoke test.

Prerequisites

  • A named repository and existing test runner
  • Sanitized Attio response fixtures or generated contract fixtures
  • A separately scoped CI credential only if a live smoke test is approved
  • The endpoint's current required scopes and pagination contract

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect workflows, fixtures, client code, and secret names. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio documentation. Use Write or Edit only after identifying the target files, constraints, and verification plan.

Current Contract

  • Test the https://api.attio.com/v2 response envelope and application-owned normalization separately.
  • Treat pagination as endpoint-specific: some endpoints use limit and offset; others return pagination.next_cursor.
  • Keep mutation tests offline unless a dedicated disposable workspace and cleanup plan are approved.
  • Never expose an access token in logs, snapshots, test names, or artifacts.

Authentication

Use a single-workspace access token for one controlled workspace or OAuth for a multi-workspace app. Grant only the endpoint scopes required by the smoke test and pass the token through the CI secret store as a Bearer credential.

Instructions

  1. Inspect the changed endpoints, request methods, scopes, and response shapes.
  2. Add fixture tests for success, structured Attio errors, pagination termination, and retry classification.
  3. Validate that snapshots redact tokens, record values, webhook secrets, and personal data.
  4. Add a disabled-by-default live job that performs only an approved read request such as listing objects.
  5. Require explicit environment configuration before that job runs; skip it cleanly on forks.
  6. Record the exact test command, fixture revision, and live-smoke disposition in the PR evidence.

Approval Boundaries

Do not create, update, or delete records from ordinary PR CI. A mutation smoke test requires a named disposable workspace, bounded fixtures, cleanup verification, and repository-owner approval.

Output

Return the endpoint contract matrix, fixture coverage, redaction result, workflow change, local command result, and live-smoke status.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Fork has no secretSkip only the live job; keep offline tests required.
Fixture differs from docsConfirm the live endpoint and refresh the fixture deliberately.
Smoke returns 403Check the endpoint's required scopes; do not broaden blindly.
Mutation detectedFail the job and remove the mutating request.

Examples

Input:

change=record-query-filter; live-smoke=read-only; fork-policy=skip-secret-job

Expected handoff:

fixtures=pass; redaction=pass; live-read=pass; writes=none

This result proves the pull-request gate exercised the contract without receiving mutation authority.

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill