Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

attio-upgrade-migration

Use this skill to migrate an existing Attio integration when endpoints, schemas, client versions, or architecture change. It guides a contract comparison, compatibility work, shadow checks, a limited canary rollout, reconciliation, and a tested rollback plan.

OriginalShow the original description

Migrate an Attio integration through a contract-led inventory, OpenAPI and documentation diff, shadow validation, canary rollout, reconciliation, and tested rollback. Use when endpoint assumptions, client versions, schemas, or integration architecture must change. Trigger with "upgrade Attio integration", "Attio migration", or "Attio API contract change".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Comparing an Attio integration with current API contracts
  • Planning schema or pagination changes
  • Checking a migration with shadow reads and fixtures
  • Rolling out to one workspace with rollback ready

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md2.1 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Attio Contract Migration

Overview

This skill migrates the integration that actually exists. It does not assume a generic historical version jump; it proves every affected endpoint and data shape against current Attio contracts.

Prerequisites

  • Current integration commit, dependencies, and deployment topology
  • Endpoint, scope, pagination, data-shape, and webhook inventory
  • Representative redacted fixtures and reconciliation queries
  • Canary cohort, rollback owner, and recovery objective

Tool Discipline

Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inventory current assumptions and tests. Use WebFetch only for current official Attio documentation and OpenAPI. Use Write or Edit after the contract diff, rollout boundary, and rollback point are documented.

Current Contract

  • Validate method, path, scopes, request fields, response fields, value shapes, and pagination per endpoint.
  • Treat official OpenAPI as an input to the diff, not a substitute for behavioral fixtures and endpoint documentation.
  • Record and entry queries may use offset pagination and score-based rate accounting; other endpoints can expose cursors.
  • Webhook changes must preserve raw-body signature verification and at-least-once idempotency.

Authentication

Preserve tenant-to-token binding and least privilege throughout the migration. Any new scope requires explicit justification, administrator approval, and a reversible credential plan.

Instructions

  1. Freeze a baseline of call sites, dependencies, contracts, fixtures, metrics, and current production behavior.
  2. Diff each affected endpoint against official documentation and OpenAPI.
  3. Classify changes as compatible, additive, behavior-sensitive, or breaking.
  4. Add compatibility adapters and tests for pagination, value shapes, errors, idempotency, and redaction.
  5. Run shadow reads or dry-run comparisons and reconcile mismatches without customer-facing mutations.
  6. Canary one bounded workspace or workload with explicit health and rollback thresholds.
  7. Expand in stages, retain rollback until reconciliation passes, then remove obsolete paths deliberately.

Approval Boundaries

Do not add scopes, alter destructive mutations, switch all tenants, or remove the rollback path without owner approval and recorded evidence.

Output

Return the before-and-after contract matrix, risk classification, adapter plan, test evidence, shadow or canary results, reconciliation status, and rollback decision.

Error Handling

ConditionResponse
Official sources disagreePause the affected endpoint and preserve both references.
Shadow results divergeClassify the mismatch and keep production on the old path.
Canary error budget failsRoll back and retain captured redacted evidence.
Rollback cannot restore stateStop before rollout and repair recovery first.

Examples

Input:

change=replace hand-written record client; cohort=one test workspace

Expected handoff:

contract-diff=complete; shadow=matched; canary=pass; rollback=retained

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill