Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

auditing-python-dependencies

Check a Python project's direct and indirect dependencies for known vulnerabilities using pip-audit. Get findings organized by severity, affected version, and available fixes, with JSON, JSONL, or Markdown reports for release checks and audit evidence.

OriginalShow the original description

Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Checking dependencies before merging Python changes
  • Reviewing dependencies after a PyPI security incident
  • Collecting dependency audit evidence for SOC2
  • Assessing an unfamiliar Python codebase

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • references/PLAYBOOK.md5.6 KB
  • references/THEORY.md5.4 KB
  • scripts/audit_python.py16.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Auditing Python Dependencies

Overview

PyPI hosts north of 500,000 packages, with several thousand new releases every day. The package-install model is identical to npm in the relevant ways: a pip install resolves a transitive graph, runs each package's setup.py (which executes arbitrary Python at install time), and writes the result to your site-packages. The CVE attack surface is therefore the same shape: known vulnerabilities, maintainer-account takeovers, typosquats, and protestware.

The PyPA-blessed auditor is pip-audit. It queries the Open Source Vulnerabilities (OSV) database (which mirrors PyPA's advisory feed plus aggregated CVE / GHSA records) and reports per-package vulnerable versions. pip-audit integrates with requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock, so most Python project layouts are first-class.

This skill wraps pip-audit, normalizes its severity vocabulary to the shared Severity enum, and emits Findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. If pip-audit isn't installed on the host, the skill falls back to pip list --outdated and emits INFO-level findings recommending the operator install pip-audit for accurate vulnerability detection.

When the skill produces findings

FindingSeverityThresholdAffected control
Critical CVE in installed packageCRITICALOSV severity band corresponds to CVSS ≥ 9.0CWE-1104
High CVE in installed packageHIGHOSV severity band corresponds to CVSS 7.0–8.9CWE-1104
Medium CVE in installed packageMEDIUMOSV severity band corresponds to CVSS 4.0–6.9CWE-1104
Low CVE in installed packageLOWOSV severity band corresponds to CVSS 0.1–3.9CWE-1104
Vulnerable package with no patchHIGHfinding has no fix_versions and severity ≥ mediumCWE-1395
Outdated package (no CVE)INFOpip list --outdated reports a newer version(operational)
pip-audit not installedINFObinary not on PATH; scanner fell back to pip list(operational)
Audit DB unreachableINFOpip-audit network error reaching OSV(operational)

OSV is the upstream of record. pip-audit also consults the PyPA advisory database for Python-specific records that may not yet have a CVE assigned.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.9+
  • pip-audit installed (pip install pip-audit); skill falls back to pip list --outdated if absent
  • Target project containing at minimum one of: requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, Pipfile.lock, poetry.lock
  • Network access to OSV (api.osv.dev) and PyPI (pypi.org)

Instructions

Step 1 — Identify the scan target

Locate the project directory. The scanner auto-detects requirement files in order of preference:

  1. poetry.lock (most precise — exact resolved tree)
  2. Pipfile.lock
  3. requirements.txt (and requirements-*.txt siblings)
  4. pyproject.toml (PEP 621 dependencies)
  5. Installed environment via pip list (last resort)

Step 2 — Run the audit

python3 ./scripts/audit_python.py /path/to/python-project

Options:

Usage: audit_python.py PATH [OPTIONS]

Options:
  --output FILE      Write findings to FILE (default: stdout)
  --format FMT       json | jsonl | markdown (default: markdown)
  --min-severity SEV (default: info)
  --requirement FILE Override auto-detection; specify a particular
                     requirements file (repeatable)
  --include-dev      Include development dependencies (default: prod
                     only when project layout allows the distinction)
  --strict           Treat pip-audit warnings as errors

Step 3 — Interpret findings

CRITICAL / HIGH = block release.

MEDIUM / LOW = track but don't block; many Python advisories report edge-case theoretical issues that don't apply to your usage.

INFO = log only; e.g. "outdated but no known CVE" is information for your release cadence, not a security action.

Step 4 — Remediation

For a vulnerable package with fix_versions:

  1. Bump the version pin in your requirements file:

    - requests==2.20.0
    + requests==2.31.0
    
  2. Run pip install -r requirements.txt --upgrade (or poetry lock --no-update && poetry update <pkg>).

  3. Run the test suite. CVE fixes occasionally include behavioral changes you didn't expect.

  4. Commit the lock file diff alongside the requirements bump.

For a vulnerable transitive dep (one you didn't declare directly):

  1. Find the parent: pip show <vulnerable-package> lists the parents in its "Required-by" line.

  2. Check whether bumping the parent picks up the fix. pip index versions <parent> lists available versions.

  3. If parent doesn't have a newer release that floors the vulnerable dep above the fix version, pin the transitive dep yourself in your requirements file. pip will use the more specific pin.

For a vulnerable package with NO fix available:

  1. Subscribe to PyPA advisory notifications for that package.

  2. If the vulnerability is exploitable in your usage, either replace the package or vendor + patch locally.

  3. Document the exception in your security register with a re-evaluation date.

Examples

Example 1 — Pre-merge gate

python3 ./scripts/audit_python.py . --min-severity high --format json --output audit.json
jq -e '. == []' audit.json || { echo "High/critical Python CVE — fix before merge"; exit 1; }

Example 2 — CI scan on every push

- name: pip-audit
  run: pip install pip-audit
- name: Run audit
  run: |
    python3 plugins/security/penetration-tester/skills/auditing-python-dependencies/scripts/audit_python.py \
        . --min-severity high --format markdown --output py-audit.md

Example 3 — SOC2 evidence collection

mkdir -p evidence/CC7/
python3 ./scripts/audit_python.py . --include-dev --format json \
    --output evidence/CC7/py-audit-$(date +%Y%m%d).json

--include-dev for SOC2: include dev/test deps so auditors see the full surface, not just production.

Output

JSON / JSONL / Markdown per lib/report.py. Exit codes: 0 clean, 1 high/critical, 2 error.

Each Finding includes:

  • id — synthesized as pypi-audit::<cve-id> (or pypi-audit::<ghsa> / pypi-audit::<pypa-id> when no CVE)
  • severity — CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / INFO
  • category — dependency-vulnerability
  • summary — short CVE / GHSA title
  • evidence — affected package, affected version, fix versions, advisory ID
  • references — OSV URL, CVE URL, PyPA advisory URL

Error Handling

  • pip-audit not installed → falls back to pip list --outdated, emits an INFO Finding flagging the degraded scan, and proceeds.
  • No requirement file found → emits an INFO Finding "no Python project structure recognized" and exits 2.
  • OSV API unreachable → emits an INFO Finding documenting the outage and exits 0 (no actionable security finding).
  • pip-audit returns malformed JSON → emits an INFO Finding with the raw output truncated to 500 chars and exits 2.

Resources

  • references/THEORY.md — PyPI supply-chain history, OSV vs NVD vs PyPA advisory scopes, why ecosystem-specific severity matters, Python-specific install-time risks (setup.py execution, eager dependency resolution), pip-audit vs Safety vs Snyk trade-offs
  • references/PLAYBOOK.md — Per-toolchain remediation patterns (pip + requirements.txt, poetry, pipenv, uv, conda), monorepo / workspace scanning, override-equivalent patterns in Python ecosystem, GitHub Dependabot ecosystem mapping, SOC2 evidence retention

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 25, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill