Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

canva-advanced-troubleshooting

Investigate difficult Canva Connect failures by separating application, OAuth, provider, async job, and network evidence. It supports read-only reproduction and creates a redacted support record without replaying writes or exposing customer data.

OriginalShow the original description

Isolate difficult Canva Connect failures without rotating credentials, replaying writes, or leaking customer data. Use when investigating intermittent transport, OAuth, async-job, capability, or preview-feature failures. Trigger with: "deep debug Canva", "Canva intermittent failure", "prepare Canva support evidence".

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,884 stars(GitHub 2,884 + cccskills 0)
Works withCanva

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Classifying intermittent Canva API failures
  • Tracing an export job that remains in progress
  • Preparing redacted evidence for Canva support
  • Reproducing an issue with a dedicated test user

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB
  • references/official-docs.md512 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Canva Advanced Failure Isolation

Overview

Separate application, authorization, provider-contract, asynchronous-job, and network evidence before choosing a recovery action. Preserve the original operation identity and collect only redacted facts.

Prerequisites

  • Incident identifier, first-observed time, and affected operation
  • Current integration configuration and pinned OpenAPI version
  • Approved synthetic reproduction user and evidence destination

Instructions

Step 1: Freeze the failing operation

Record method, endpoint pattern, environment, opaque operation or job identifier, expected terminal state, and last known good release. Do not copy raw payloads or URLs.

Step 2: Inspect local evidence

Use Read and Grep to compare sanitized logs, deployment/config revisions, token metadata timestamps, scope policy, and the pinned response schema.

Step 3: Classify the boundary

Distinguish transport failure, HTTP/provider error, OAuth expiry or revocation, missing explicit scope, unavailable capability, preview drift, and an asynchronous job still in progress.

Step 4: Reproduce read-only

Use a dedicated test user for the smallest non-mutating check. Never refresh a token merely to diagnose unless the credential owner authorizes rotation and atomic storage is available.

Step 5: Reconcile before retry

Query the existing job or resource where the contract permits. Do not recreate a design, export, upload, or autofill job until duplicate impact and idempotency are resolved.

Step 6: Escalate with a safe receipt

Provide Canva support only the integration ID, UTC window, endpoint pattern, redacted error code, opaque request/job reference, contract version, and bounded reproduction result.

Authentication

Canva Connect calls use Bearer access tokens obtained by a backend through OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code with SHA-256 PKCE. Request explicit least-privilege scopes, keep client secrets and tokens out of browser-visible state, and serialize refresh so the replacement single-use refresh token is stored atomically.

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep for discovery and evidence. Use Write or Edit only for the approved artifact, code, configuration, test, or receipt described by this workflow; do not make an unapproved Canva-side change.

Output

  • Scoped decision or implementation artifact
  • Redacted operation and validation receipt
  • Failure, rollback, and follow-up ownership record

Examples

A production export intermittently remains in progress. The operator correlates the same job ID with deployment and provider evidence, pauses new submissions, and escalates without attaching the design or token.

Error Handling

FailureResponse
No stable operation IDStop mutation and recover the application ledger first
OAuth state unclearRoute to the credential owner; do not test by printing or exchanging secrets
Preview contract changedDisable the preview path and compare current first-party docs
Support asks for sensitive dataRedact or decline and provide opaque references instead

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill