Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

canva-common-errors

Classifies Canva Connect failures using the HTTP status, provider error code, operation, and authorization state. It helps choose a next step such as refreshing access, reauthorizing, waiting, correcting input, reconciling a job, or escalating a provider issue.

OriginalShow the original description

Analyze and classify Canva Connect failures by HTTP status, provider error code, operation, and authorization state. Use when deciding whether to refresh, reauthorize, wait, reconcile, correct input, or escalate. Trigger with: "Canva API error", "Canva 401", "Canva 403 or 429".

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2,884 stars(GitHub 2,884 + cccskills 0)
Works withCanva

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Diagnosing a Canva 401 or expired access token
  • Choosing a response to a 403 or 429
  • Deciding whether to retry or escalate server errors

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.9 KB
  • references/official-docs.md508 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Canva Error Classification

Overview

Treat HTTP status alone as insufficient. Use the current endpoint reference and redacted provider error code to separate caller defects, authorization failures, throttling, preview drift, and provider incidents.

Prerequisites

  • HTTP status, provider error code, endpoint pattern, and UTC window
  • Opaque request, resource, or job reference without payload content
  • Pinned OpenAPI or endpoint documentation version

Instructions

Step 1: Capture a minimal envelope

Record method, endpoint pattern, status, provider code, terminal job state, retry metadata if actually present, and deployment version. Exclude tokens, bodies, signed URLs, and customer identifiers.

Step 2: Handle authentication failures

For an invalid or expired access token, serialize the authorized refresh flow and atomically store the replacement refresh token. Reauthorize after revocation or unrecoverable refresh failure.

Step 3: Handle authorization failures

Compare the operation with explicit granted scopes, resource ownership, capabilities, tenant policy, and preview availability. Never assume a write scope grants its read counterpart.

Step 4: Handle throttling

Pause only the affected endpoint/user queue. Use documented endpoint metadata and response instructions; otherwise apply bounded exponential backoff with jitter rather than a guessed fixed delay.

Step 5: Handle async failures

Poll the existing job to a documented terminal state. Correct validation or entitlement errors before any new submission.

Step 6: Escalate provider failures

Correlate repeated server errors with Canva status/changelog and provide a redacted support receipt after bounded retry is exhausted.

Authentication

Canva Connect calls use Bearer access tokens obtained by a backend through OAuth 2.0 Authorization Code with SHA-256 PKCE. Request explicit least-privilege scopes, keep client secrets and tokens out of browser-visible state, and serialize refresh so the replacement single-use refresh token is stored atomically.

Tool Discipline

Use Read and Grep for discovery and evidence. Use Write or Edit only for the approved artifact, code, configuration, test, or receipt described by this workflow; do not make an unapproved Canva-side change.

Output

  • Scoped decision or implementation artifact
  • Redacted operation and validation receipt
  • Failure, rollback, and follow-up ownership record

Examples

An autofill returns HTTP 403. The operator checks explicit scopes, current capability and Enterprise availability, template ownership, preview status, and the provider error before deciding whether reauthorization is relevant.

Error Handling

FailureResponse
Only HTTP status is availableCollect the redacted provider envelope before acting
Refresh repeats 401Stop and require reauthorization instead of looping
429 has no retry metadataUse the local bounded backoff policy and lower concurrency
Job failed validationCorrect the request; do not retry unchanged input

Resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Add a synthetic-data CI gate for customer-owned Abridge integration code. Test consent handling, note-review handoffs, redaction, and rollback behavior with mocked vendor boundaries, without connecting CI to a live Abridge or EHR tenant.

  • Adding regression checks to an Abridge integration repository
  • Testing consent and note-release handling
  • Checking logs for sensitive data exposure
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Triage Abridge recording, note review, Epic handoff, and access problems using observed symptoms and approved guidance. Identify the affected workflow stage, organize a minimal timeline, and prepare a redacted escalation record for the responsible team.

  • Separate recording problems from upload failures
  • Investigate note creation delays and editor issues
  • Identify the responsible team for Epic handoff failures
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Map and review an Abridge clinical documentation workflow from consent and recording through draft review, evidence checks, edits, and final disposition. Keep clinician approval explicit, identify failure exits, and separate verified facts from tenant-specific details and pending approvals.

  • Map a clinical note workflow for a care setting
  • Check where consent and patient identity are verified
  • Review draft notes against linked evidence before sign-off
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Audit how clinician-reviewed Abridge note sections map into Epic templates and downstream workflows. Use approved test records to document destinations, exceptions, evidence, rollback steps, and a go or no-go decision for a specific environment.

  • Checking Abridge note section mappings to Epic templates
  • Auditing a department’s approved documentation handoff
  • Preparing test evidence and a go or no-go decision
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Review Abridge adoption and workflow value using local usage records, clinician feedback, and verified contract costs. Build an evidence based decision table covering adoption, quality, support burden, and options to expand, hold, or improve the rollout.

  • Reviewing adoption after an Abridge rollout
  • Preparing evidence for a renewal decision
  • Comparing workflow outcomes across care settings
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Prepare a bounded support bundle for an Abridge issue using allowlisted operational details such as versions, coarse timestamps, and correlation references. Exclude recordings, transcripts, patient identifiers, credentials, and unrestricted logs, then document redactions and review details.

  • Preparing reviewed evidence for an Abridge support case
  • Documenting redactions and excluded data
  • Collecting approved operational details for an incident
jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace2.9KUpdated Oct 29, 2026

See all skills by jeremylongshore

Report a problem with this skill