Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

nasa-std-8719-14

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8719.14C (Process for Limiting Orbital Debris). Use for orbital-debris assessment planning, mission-related debris limits, explosion/passivation and collision risk, postmission disposal options, reentry casualty risk, and ODAR/EOMP governance. Covers STD-8719.14C (Approved 2021-11-05) synthesized notes only; does not replace NPR 8715.6 delivery timing, NASA-HDBK-8719.14 environment/modeling depth, or program-specific OSMA waivers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (13)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB
  • chapters/ch01-scope-and-applicability.md4.2 KB
  • chapters/ch02-assessment-overview.md4.0 KB
  • chapters/ch03-debris-released-normal-operations.md3.8 KB
  • chapters/ch04-explosions-breakups-collisions.md5.1 KB
  • chapters/ch05-postmission-disposal.md4.8 KB
  • chapters/ch06-reentry-surviving-debris.md4.3 KB
  • chapters/ch07-special-classes-odar-eomp.md5.0 KB
  • cheatsheet.md1.8 KB
  • glossary.md2.1 KB
  • LICENSE1.1 KB
  • PACK.yaml1.8 KB
  • patterns.md2.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

<!-- argument-hint: [topic, technical area, or chapter number] -->

Process for Limiting Orbital Debris (NASA-STD-8719.14C)

Source: NASA-STD-8719.14C (Approved 2021-11-05) (US Government work, public domain) | Chapters: 7

When to use

Reach for this pack when planning or reviewing NASA (or NASA-sponsored) orbital-debris assessments — applicability and NPR 8715.6 framing, assessment overview and tools, debris released in normal operations, explosions/breakups and collisions, postmission disposal of space structures, reentry surviving debris, or ODAR/EOMP content and special-mission classes.

Prerequisites: none — plain Markdown; no MCP server, API key, or licence tier needed at runtime.

How to Use This Skill

  • Without arguments — load the core frameworks below.
  • With a topic — ask about ODAR, EOMP, 25-year LEO lifetime, GEO disposal, passivation, DAS/ORSAT, or reentry casualty risk.
  • With a chapter — ask for ch01 through ch07.

Supporting files: glossary.md, patterns.md, cheatsheet.md.

Core Frameworks & Mental Models

NPR + standard pair

  • NPR 8715.6: When assessments and reports are required and delivered.
  • NASA-STD-8719.14C: Technical shalls and assessment methods for those reports. Handbook 8719.14 is a reference companion — not ingested here.

Six assessment issues (ODAR spine)

  1. Debris released during normal operations.
  2. Explosions and intentional breakups.
  3. On-orbit collisions (large objects + small MMOD that can kill disposal).
  4. Reliable postmission disposal of spacecraft and orbital stages.
  5. Surviving reentry debris / human casualty risk.
  6. Special classes (tethers, smallsats, large constellations, servicing, ADR).

Technical-area template (every §4.x)

Definition → Requirements → Rationale → Methods to assess compliance → NASA mitigation summary.

Disposal preference

Immediate removal (direct reentry or Earth escape) is the preferred 2019 ODMSP option. LEO default is “as short as practicable, ≤25 years.” Storage and long-term reentry are constrained alternatives, not a free graveyard.

Evidence pair

  • ODAR: design-time compliance case (Initial / PDR / CDR / Final).
  • EOMP: living operations plan so mission use does not preclude safe passivation and disposal.

Chapter Index

#SectionKey content
ch01Scope and ApplicabilityPurpose, Earth-orbit focus, NPR 8715.6 frame, shall language
ch02Assessment OverviewSix issues, DAS/ORSAT/ORDEM/MEM, ODAR vs EOMP cadence
ch03Debris Released in Normal Operations25-year LEO, 100 object-years, GEO debris band
ch04Explosions, Breakups, and Collisions0.001 explosion / large-object collision; passivation; 0.01 small-MMOD
ch05Postmission DisposalReentry, retrieval, storage, long-term reentry; 0.90 reliability
ch06Reentry Surviving Debris15 J threshold, 1:10,000 casualty, controlled-reentry geometry
ch07Special Classes, ODAR, EOMPODMSP Objective 5, tethers/smallsats, report formats

Topic Index

  • 25-year LEO lifetime → ch03, ch05
  • Collisions (large / small MMOD) → ch04
  • DAS / ORSAT / ORDEM / MEM → ch02, ch06
  • Disposal → ch05
  • EOMP → ch02, ch07
  • Explosions / passivation → ch04
  • GEO protection zone → ch03, ch05
  • Maintenance (passivation, EOMP updates) → ch04, ch07
  • Mission-related debris (MRD) → ch03
  • NPR 8715.6 / OSMA → ch01, ch07
  • ODAR → ch02, ch07
  • Operations (normal-release debris) → ch03
  • Orbital debris → ch01, ch02
  • Postmission disposal reliability → ch04, ch05
  • Reentry casualty / DCA → ch06
  • Special classes / tethers / CubeSats → ch07

Supporting Files

  • glossary.md — orbital-debris and assessment terms with chapter references
  • patterns.md — implementation patterns (When/How/Trade-offs)
  • cheatsheet.md — requirement numbers, thresholds, tells and smells

Scope & Limits

This pack covers NASA-STD-8719.14C (Approved 2021-11-05), Process for Limiting Orbital Debris, as synthesized reference notes from the official NTSS PDF (77 pages per extraction metadata). It does not ingest NASA-HDBK-8719.14, replace NPR 8715.6 delivery tables or OSMA waiver process, reproduce DAS/ORSAT user manuals, or dump every figure/table. IADC, UN, SPD-3, and 2019 ODMSP are cited as consistency references, not licensed inserts. US Government public domain work. No source-material download link is published.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the automotive standards landscape: ISO 26262, ASPICE, SAE J3016, UNECE R155, UNECE R156, and the NHTSA vehicle set. Contains NO source content: designation, edition, owner, status, and an official catalogue URL only. Use when you need to identify or locate an automotive standard. Most are paywalled or carry no redistribution grant and cannot be packaged; the one open path is the nhtsa-vehicle pack.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

Signpost (not a knowledge pack) for the avionics development assurance standards landscape: RTCA DO-178C / EUROCAE ED-12C and its supplements (DO-330/ED-215, DO-331/ED-218, DO-332/ED-217, DO-333/ED-216); RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80; SAE ARP4754B and ARP4761A; and the free regulator documents that recognise them (FAA AC 20-115D, AC 20-152A, Order 8110.49A; EASA AMC 20-115D and AMC 20-152A). Contains no source content: each row carries only the designation, title, edition, owner, redistributability status, and the owner's URL. Use when you need to identify, cite, or locate an avionics standard; paywalled rows point to the owner, free rows point to the regulator text, and the FAA rows also name the in-repo faa-8110-49 pack.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

Knowledge base from CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0. Use for prioritized IT/OT baseline cyber goals aligned to NIST CSF 2.0 (including GOVERN), critical-infrastructure hygiene, MSP/supply-chain expectations, and board-friendly outcome language. Covers CPG 2.0 goals only; does not replace full CSF programs, sector-specific goals (SSGs), or CSET tooling detail.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

Knowledge pack from 'Towards Digital Engineering: The Advent of Digital Systems Engineering' (Huang et al., Old Dominion University, arXiv:2002.11672, 2020). Use when reasoning about digital engineering, the DoD Digital Engineering Strategy and its five goals, the Authoritative Source of Truth, digitalization vs. digitization, digital augmentation, digitalized models, provenance, unique identification, and the four-level (vision/strategy/action/foundation) DSE research framework. Covers the conceptual/vision layer of the field. SCOPE LIMITS: this is a single ~28-page vision paper, not a methods handbook — it is thin on step-by-step procedures, tooling, case studies, and quantitative evaluation, and it predates 2020 so it does not cover later digital-engineering standards or recent AI/LLM advances. Use the sebok pack for established SE canon and MBSE depth.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

jgsystemsconsulting/jgs-se-knowledge-packs8Updated Oct 15, 2026

See all skills by jgsystemsconsulting

Report a problem with this skill